All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kenny Ho <Kenny.Ho@amd.com>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [agd5f:amd-staging-drm-next 1241/1278] drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:799:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 12:25:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202207301226.1DMFCdHt-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

tree:   https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/agd5f/linux.git amd-staging-drm-next
head:   2305916dca043ed69bd464f74a886b0216780aa6
commit: 53069c3922842db6f01ca9008e6a45d0fd3a083e [1241/1278] thunderbolt: test: use NULL macros
config: s390-randconfig-r044-20220729 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220730/202207301226.1DMFCdHt-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 16.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 52cd00cabf479aa7eb6dbb063b7ba41ea57bce9e)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
        git remote add agd5f https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/agd5f/linux.git
        git fetch --no-tags agd5f amd-staging-drm-next
        git checkout 53069c3922842db6f01ca9008e6a45d0fd3a083e
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:12:
   In file included from drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h:13:
   In file included from include/linux/pci.h:39:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:464:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:477:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
   #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
   #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:12:
   In file included from drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h:13:
   In file included from include/linux/pci.h:39:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
   #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:12:
   In file included from drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h:13:
   In file included from include/linux/pci.h:39:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                               ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:799:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, path);
           ^
>> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:850:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, path);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:912:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, path);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:992:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, path);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1072:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, path);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1164:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, path);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1256:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, path);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1300:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, tunnel1);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1352:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, tunnel);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1398:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, tunnel);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1448:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, tunnel);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1513:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, tunnel);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1569:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, tunnel1);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1631:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, dp_tunnel);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1688:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, tunnel);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1731:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, tunnel);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1768:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, tunnel);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1814:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, tunnel);
           ^
   drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1860:2: error: call to undeclared function 'KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, tunnel);
           ^
   fatal error: too many errors emitted, stopping now [-ferror-limit=]
   12 warnings and 20 errors generated.


vim +/KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL +799 drivers/thunderbolt/test.c

   783	
   784	static void tb_test_path_not_connected(struct kunit *test)
   785	{
   786		struct tb_switch *host, *dev1, *dev2;
   787		struct tb_port *down, *up;
   788		struct tb_path *path;
   789	
   790		host = alloc_host(test);
   791		dev1 = alloc_dev_default(test, host, 0x3, false);
   792		/* Not connected to anything */
   793		dev2 = alloc_dev_default(test, NULL, 0x303, false);
   794	
   795		down = &dev1->ports[10];
   796		up = &dev2->ports[9];
   797	
   798		path = tb_path_alloc(NULL, down, 8, up, 8, 0, "PCIe Down");
 > 799		KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, path);
   800		path = tb_path_alloc(NULL, down, 8, up, 8, 1, "PCIe Down");
   801		KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, path);
   802	}
   803	
   804	struct hop_expectation {
   805		u64 route;
   806		u8 in_port;
   807		enum tb_port_type in_type;
   808		u8 out_port;
   809		enum tb_port_type out_type;
   810	};
   811	
   812	static void tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane0(struct kunit *test)
   813	{
   814		/*
   815		 * PCIe path from host to device using lane 0.
   816		 *
   817		 *   [Host]
   818		 *   3 |: 4
   819		 *   1 |: 2
   820		 *  [Device]
   821		 */
   822		static const struct hop_expectation test_data[] = {
   823			{
   824				.route = 0x0,
   825				.in_port = 9,
   826				.in_type = TB_TYPE_PCIE_DOWN,
   827				.out_port = 3,
   828				.out_type = TB_TYPE_PORT,
   829			},
   830			{
   831				.route = 0x3,
   832				.in_port = 1,
   833				.in_type = TB_TYPE_PORT,
   834				.out_port = 9,
   835				.out_type = TB_TYPE_PCIE_UP,
   836			},
   837		};
   838		struct tb_switch *host, *dev;
   839		struct tb_port *down, *up;
   840		struct tb_path *path;
   841		int i;
   842	
   843		host = alloc_host(test);
   844		dev = alloc_dev_default(test, host, 0x3, false);
   845	
   846		down = &host->ports[9];
   847		up = &dev->ports[9];
   848	
   849		path = tb_path_alloc(NULL, down, 8, up, 8, 0, "PCIe Down");
 > 850		KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, path);
   851		KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, path->path_length, ARRAY_SIZE(test_data));
   852		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); i++) {
   853			const struct tb_port *in_port, *out_port;
   854	
   855			in_port = path->hops[i].in_port;
   856			out_port = path->hops[i].out_port;
   857	
   858			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(in_port->sw), test_data[i].route);
   859			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->port, test_data[i].in_port);
   860			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)in_port->config.type,
   861					test_data[i].in_type);
   862			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(out_port->sw), test_data[i].route);
   863			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->port, test_data[i].out_port);
   864			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (enum tb_port_type)out_port->config.type,
   865					test_data[i].out_type);
   866		}
   867		tb_path_free(path);
   868	}
   869	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

                 reply	other threads:[~2022-07-30  4:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202207301226.1DMFCdHt-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=Kenny.Ho@amd.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ribalda@chromium.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.