From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Teigland Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 11:51:16 -0500 Subject: [Cluster-devel] [GIT PULL] dlm updates for 6.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20220801144329.GA10643@redhat.com> <20220801155028.GA12328@redhat.com> <20220801155624.GB12328@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20220801165115.GC12328@redhat.com> List-Id: To: cluster-devel.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 09:17:30AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > But again: please don't rebase stuff you have already exposed to > others. It causes real issues. This was just one example of it. > > And if you *do* have to rebase for a real technical reason ("Oh, that > was a disaster, it absolutely *must* be fixed"), please let involved > people know asap. > > And a version number change is not a "huge disaster, must rebase". Yep, thanks for the comments. For some reason this escaped the usual flags that should have gone off in my head about rebasing. Dave From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F90C00144 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 16:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232518AbiHAQvZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2022 12:51:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45752 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231551AbiHAQvW (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2022 12:51:22 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EB127B1A for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 09:51:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1659372681; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vQCGuIanIjFTeXrqhqN+Uxy55c+p5UePXfr7CwbLB6M=; b=QTH3EG+5fJnp6tUHlRBKoAqJ0Huqhojs5IoHr+AW+Kyup5RYUitC8M1ZNEC/qBpP8O0fkD UB1WoDy7u+kH5G9bqVfFFP4hZGS6GumMypnm6esDKMtlh1Va2h9953yFFbgQMlXCn1PF2f cUl0xBNiQgZgLo2mXdpLhwS/wIwuNmE= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-625-UNvilHVpP_edRKiKVBdNfA-1; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:51:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: UNvilHVpP_edRKiKVBdNfA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95E0E3C11E6B; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 16:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (null.msp.redhat.com [10.15.80.136]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 617C3492C3B; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 16:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 11:51:16 -0500 From: David Teigland To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] dlm updates for 6.0 Message-ID: <20220801165115.GC12328@redhat.com> References: <20220801144329.GA10643@redhat.com> <20220801155028.GA12328@redhat.com> <20220801155624.GB12328@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.10 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 09:17:30AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > But again: please don't rebase stuff you have already exposed to > others. It causes real issues. This was just one example of it. > > And if you *do* have to rebase for a real technical reason ("Oh, that > was a disaster, it absolutely *must* be fixed"), please let involved > people know asap. > > And a version number change is not a "huge disaster, must rebase". Yep, thanks for the comments. For some reason this escaped the usual flags that should have gone off in my head about rebasing. Dave