From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic: test fsync after punching hole adjacent to an existing hole
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 08:29:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220809072956.GA2067106@falcondesktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220809033551.ip3lq5kkhvabdppn@zlang-mailbox>
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 11:35:51AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 12:18:58PM +0100, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> >
> > Test that if we punch a hole adjacent to an existing hole, fsync the file
> > and then power fail, the new hole exists after mounting again the
> > filesystem.
> >
> > This currently fails on btrfs with kernels 5.18 and 5.19 when not using
> > the "no-holes" feature. The "no-holes" feature is enabled by default at
> > mkfs time starting with btrfs-progs 5.15, so to trigger the issue with
> > btrfs-progs 5.15+ and kernel 5.18 or kernel 5.19, one must set
> > "-O ^no-holes" in the MKFS_OPTIONS environment variable (part of the
> > btrfs test matrix).
> >
> > The issue is fixed for btrfs with the following kernel patch:
> >
> > "btrfs: update generation of hole file extent item when merging holes"
>
> CC btrfs list
It was already in cc (and I always cc the btrfs list).
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> > ---
> > tests/generic/694 | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tests/generic/694.out | 15 ++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100755 tests/generic/694
> > create mode 100644 tests/generic/694.out
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/generic/694 b/tests/generic/694
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 00000000..c034f914
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/generic/694
> > @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
> > +#! /bin/bash
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +# Copyright (C) 2022 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved.
> > +#
> > +# FS QA Test 694
> > +#
> > +# Test that if we punch a hole adjacent to an existing hole, fsync the file and
> > +# then power fail, the new hole exists after mounting again the filesystem.
>
> Better to explain this's a known regression test at here.
So, duplicate the changelog here?
>
> And add _fixed_by_kernel_commit later, after that kernel patch is merged and
> has a fixed commit id.
I wasn't aware we have that nowadays.
Does that mean that tests get merged only after the corresponding kernel fix
is merged in Linus' tree?
>
> > +#
> > +. ./common/preamble
> > +_begin_fstest quick log punch
>
> "auto" group?
Yes, forgotten when running the "new" script.
>
> > +
> > +_cleanup()
> > +{
> > + _cleanup_flakey
> > + cd /
> > + rm -r -f $tmp.*
> > +}
> > +
> > +# Import common functions.
> > +. ./common/filter
> > +. ./common/dmflakey
> > +. ./common/punch
> > +
> > +# real QA test starts here
> > +
> > +# Modify as appropriate.
> ^^^^
> This's just a reminder, please remove it.
>
> > +_supported_fs generic
> > +_require_scratch
> > +_require_dm_target flakey
> > +_require_xfs_io_command "fpunch"
> > +_require_xfs_io_command "fiemap"
> > +
> > +_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
> > +_require_metadata_journaling $SCRATCH_DEV
> > +_init_flakey
> > +_mount_flakey
> > +
> > +# Create our test file with the following layout:
> > +#
> > +# [0, 2M) - hole
> > +# [2M, 10M) - extent
> > +# [10M, 12M) - hole
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 12M" \
> > + -c "pwrite -S 0xab 2M 8M" \
> > + $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar | _filter_xfs_io
> > +
> > +# Persist everything, commit the filesystem's transaction.
> > +sync
> > +
> > +# Now punch two holes in the file:
> > +#
> > +# 1) For the range [2M, 4M), which is adjacent to the existing hole in the range
> > +# [0, 2M);
> > +# 2) For the range [8M, 10M), which is adjacent to the existing hole in the
> > +# range [10M, 12M).
> > +#
> > +# These operations start a new filesystem transaction.
> > +# Then finally fsync the file.
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fpunch 2M 2M" \
> > + -c "fpunch 8M 2M" \
> > + -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar
>
> Darrick added a new helper _require_congruent_file_oplen(), might worth
> using it. Any thoughts?
Wasn't aware of it. Seems like it's to deal with some rare xfs realtime configurations.
So I suppose, this needs:
_require_congruent_file_oplen $((2 * 1024 * 1024))
>
> > +
> > +# Simulate a power failure and mount the filesystem to check that everything
> > +# is in the same state as before the power failure.
> > +_flakey_drop_and_remount
> > +
> > +# We expect the following file layout:
> > +#
> > +# [0, 4M) - hole
> > +# [4M, 8M) - extent
> > +# [8M, 12M) - hole
> > +echo "File layout after power failure:"
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar | _filter_fiemap
> > +
> > +# When reading the file we expect to get the range [4M, 8M) filled with bytes
> > +# that have a value of 0xab and 0x00 for anything outside that range.
> > +echo "File content after power failure:"
> > +od -A d -t x1 $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar
>
> Can _hexdump in common/rc help ?
It can, I wasn't aware that helper existed. It's relatively new.
Glad to see od is being preferred over hexdump, and I have always used it in
tests over the years.
Btw, _hexdump is asking od to output file offsets in hex.
I find it a lot more friendly to read decimal values (maybe I'm weird), so
I always pass '-A d' to od. Thoughts on that?
Thanks.
>
> > +
> > +_unmount_flakey
> > +
> > +# success, all done
> > +status=0
> > +exit
> > diff --git a/tests/generic/694.out b/tests/generic/694.out
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..f55212f3
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/generic/694.out
> > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> > +QA output created by 694
> > +wrote 8388608/8388608 bytes at offset 2097152
> > +XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> > +File layout after power failure:
> > +0: [0..8191]: hole
> > +1: [8192..16383]: data
> > +2: [16384..24575]: hole
> > +File content after power failure:
> > +0000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > +*
> > +4194304 ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab
> > +*
> > +8388608 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > +*
> > +12582912
> > --
> > 2.35.1
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-09 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-08 11:18 [PATCH] generic: test fsync after punching hole adjacent to an existing hole fdmanana
2022-08-09 3:35 ` Zorro Lang
2022-08-09 7:29 ` Filipe Manana [this message]
2022-08-09 15:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-08-11 17:05 ` Zorro Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220809072956.GA2067106@falcondesktop \
--to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.