All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-phy@lists.infradead.org" <linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>,
	"kabel@kernel.org" <kabel@kernel.org>,
	Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: ARMADA espressobin SATA drive detection failure
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 04:56:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220812045650.nzisin52zfbbwhsq@shindev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220810103654.w3yurhdeulgyepbb@shindev>

On Aug 10, 2022 / 19:36, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> On Aug 09, 2022 / 11:42, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Hello Shinichiro!
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Sorry for late reply. At the time when you sent this message I had
> > issues with office station and was waiting for repairing support. And
> > after that I forgot about this email.
> > 
> > Now I have looked at it. For testing purposes I took Espressobin V5
> > board and some random SATA disk (some Samsung SSD). I installed latest
> > firmwares (secure-firmware, ARM trusted-firmware and U-Boot) on
> > Espressobin's SPI-NOR and Linux kernel version 5.18.16 on SD card.
> > 
> > Disk is successfully detected in U-Boot as:
> 
> Hello Pali! Thank you for looking into this. So, there should be something
> different between your system and my system.
> 
> > Could you please check if you still have these issues with the 5.18.16
> > kernel version (IIRC it should be the latest 5.18 release)?
> > 
> > And could you please check if your disk is working fine in U-Boot?
> 
> Yes, I will check these points. Let me have several days to work on them.

Hello Pali, I've tried the latest 5.18.x kernel and disk detection by U-boot.
Unfortunately, the issue is still observed with the kernel v5.18.16. When I
connect my SSD to the board, it prints out the message "ata1: SATA link down
(SStatus 101 SControl 300)", and the SSD is not detected as a sd device.

From U-Boot, my SSD is detected. "scsi scan" command shows the SSD vendor name
"SanDisk". I was able to look in ext4 filesystem on the SSD from U-Boot. So it
looks ok from U-Boot to access the SSD.

  Marvell>> scsi scan
  scanning bus for devices...
  Target spinup took 0 ms.
  AHCI 0001.0300 32 slots 1 ports 6 Gbps 0x1 impl SATA mode
  flags: ncq led only pmp fbss pio slum part sxs 
    Device 0: (0:0) Vendor: ATA Prod.: SanDisk SDSSDA24 Rev: U210
              Type: Hard Disk
              Capacity: 228936.5 MB = 223.5 GB (468862128 x 512)
  Marvell>> scsi info
  Device 0: (0:0) Vendor: ATA Prod.: SanDisk SDSSDA24 Rev: U210
              Type: Hard Disk
              Capacity: 228936.5 MB = 223.5 GB (468862128 x 512)
  Marvell>> ext4ls scsi 0 /
  <DIR>       4096 .
  <DIR>       4096 ..
  <DIR>      16384 lost+found
                 4 bar
  Marvell>>


I noticed one difference between your system and mine: U-Boot version.
On my system, it has rather old version now:

  Marvell>> version
  U-Boot 2017.03-armada-17.10.2-g14aeedc (Jun 01 2018 - 15:39:10 +0800)
  aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Linaro GCC 5.2-2015.11-2) 5.2.1 20151005
  GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.25.0 Linaro 2015_10

Do you think it's worth trying the latest U-boot?

-- 
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-12  4:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-31 12:41 ARMADA espressobin SATA drive detection failure Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-05-31 14:00 ` Marek Behún
2022-06-06  1:57   ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-08-09  9:42 ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-10 10:36   ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-08-12  4:56     ` Shinichiro Kawasaki [this message]
2022-08-12  8:20       ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-12 12:00         ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-08-12 12:44           ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-12 13:55             ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-13  0:02               ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-08-13  0:15                 ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-13  1:00                   ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-08-13  1:03                     ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-13  1:35                       ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-08-13  9:32                         ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-13 11:53                           ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-08-13 12:01                             ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-13 12:47                               ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-08-13 12:50                                 ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-13 23:02                                   ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-08-13 23:10                                     ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-25 13:00                                       ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-25 22:15                                         ` Marek Behún
2022-08-26  5:00                                           ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-08-26 12:05                                             ` Marek Behún
2022-08-29  0:20                                               ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-08-29  8:33                                                 ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-26  7:28                                           ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-25 13:04                                       ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-26  4:57                                         ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-08-26  7:34                                           ` Pali Rohár

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220812045650.nzisin52zfbbwhsq@shindev \
    --to=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    --cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=kabel@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.