From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 07/10] net: dsa: microchip: warn about not supported synclko properties on KSZ9893 chips
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 06:26:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220814042608.GC12534@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YvgMnfSkEeD8jwIG@lunn.ch>
Ccing Rob Herring.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 10:42:05PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 06:18:50PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 05:11:45PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 04:32:15PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 04:42:34PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 01:56:01PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > > > > Hm, if we will have any random not support OF property in the switch
> > > > > > node. We won't be able to warn about it anyway. So, if it is present
> > > > > > but not supported, we will just ignore it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll drop this patch.
> > > > >
> > > > > To continue, I think the right way to go about this is to edit the
> > > > > dt-schema to say that these properties are only applicable to certain
> > > > > compatible strings, rather than for all. Then due to the
> > > > > "unevaluatedProperties: false", you'd get the warnings you want, at
> > > > > validation time.
> > > >
> > > > Hm, with "unevaluatedProperties: false" i have no warnings. Even if I
> > > > create examples with random strings as properties. Are there some new
> > > > json libraries i should use?
> > >
> > > Try
> > >
> > > additionalProperties: False
> >
> > Yes, it works. But in this case I'll do more changes. Just wont to make
> > sure I do not fix not broken things.
>
> I've been working on converting some old SoCs bindings from .txt to
> .yaml. My observations is that the yaml is sometimes more restrictive
> than what the drivers actually imposes. So you might need to change
> perfectly working .dts files to get it warning free. Or you just
> accept the warnings and move on. At lot will depend on the number of
> warnings and how easy it is to see real problems mixed in with
> warnings you never intend to fix.
Heh :) Currently with "unevaluatedProperties: false" restrictions do not
work at all. At least for me. For example with this change I have no
warnings:
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/nxp,sja1105.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/nxp,sja1105.yaml
index 1e26d876d1463..da38ad98a152f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/nxp,sja1105.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/nxp,sja1105.yaml
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ examples:
ethernet-switch@1 {
reg = <0x1>;
compatible = "nxp,sja1105t";
+ something-random-here;
ethernet-ports {
#address-cells = <1>;
make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/nxp,sja1105.yaml
So the main question is, is it broken for all or just for me? If it is
just me, what i'm doing wrong?
Regards,
Oleksij
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-14 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-29 13:03 [PATCH net-next v1 00/10] net: dsa: microchip: add error handling and register access validation Oleksij Rempel
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 01/10] net: dsa: microchip: don't announce extended register support on non Gbit chips Oleksij Rempel
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 02/10] net: dsa: microchip: allow to pass return values for PHY read/write accesses Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-02 11:19 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 03/10] net: dsa: microchip: forward error value on all ksz_pread/ksz_pwrite functions Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-02 11:19 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 04/10] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: add error handling to ksz9477_r/w_phy Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-02 11:24 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 05/10] net: dsa: microchip: ksz8795: add error handling to ksz8_r/w_phy Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-02 11:29 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 06/10] net: dsa: microchip: KSZ9893: do not write to not supported Output Clock Control Register Oleksij Rempel
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 07/10] net: dsa: microchip: warn about not supported synclko properties on KSZ9893 chips Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-02 11:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-08-05 11:56 ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-05 13:42 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-08-13 14:32 ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-13 15:11 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-08-13 16:18 ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-13 20:42 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-08-14 4:26 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2022-08-14 8:04 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 08/10] net: dsa: microchip: add support for regmap_access_tables Oleksij Rempel
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 09/10] net: dsa: microchip: add regmap_range for KSZ8563 chip Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-01 5:11 ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 10/10] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: remove MII_CTRL1000 check from ksz9477_w_phy() Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220814042608.GC12534@pengutronix.de \
--to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.