From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5776C32772 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 19:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241359AbiHQTEb (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2022 15:04:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60150 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241265AbiHQTEU (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2022 15:04:20 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C89894A12C for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 12:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3AD3B81F0E for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 19:04:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30F84C433D7; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 19:04:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1660763040; bh=hFCzvggNVuJjL8oGUQDMjGcian4EEzMUaF5RHxENh68=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:From; b=vHAw1Hr9GkFHA+aXC2R1QXKxwRDucwV4QWB/xe7tM/+PlwsrRzJ74T/JFoEhf+pVX ogPST2Cy6yVm/3DJJCQ4WQMk6aZNknU/gDUIXxq3ecyfvtj3LgwqMCtxhUke4bLJaT ARTQahiVIczZF7UtiiKUk0X9hq1c3VNuiSM1S57A= Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 12:03:59 -0700 To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, willy@infradead.org, will@kernel.org, vbabka@suse.cz, vaibhav@linux.ibm.com, tj@kernel.org, szhai2@cs.rochester.edu, suleiman@google.com, steven@liquorix.net, sofia.trinh@edi.works, rppt@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, oleksandr@natalenko.name, Michael@MichaelLarabel.com, mhocko@kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, linmiaohe@huawei.com, holger@applied-asynchrony.com, Hi-Angel@yandex.ru, heftig@archlinux.org, hdanton@sina.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, djbyrne@mtu.edu, d@chaos-reins.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, corbet@lwn.net, catalin.marinas@arm.com, bgeffon@google.com, baohua@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, ak@linux.intel.com, yuzhao@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org From: Andrew Morton Subject: + mm-vmscanc-refactor-shrink_node.patch added to mm-unstable branch Message-Id: <20220817190400.30F84C433D7@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org The patch titled Subject: mm/vmscan.c: refactor shrink_node() has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is mm-vmscanc-refactor-shrink_node.patch This patch will shortly appear at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-vmscanc-refactor-shrink_node.patch This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm and is updated there every 2-3 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Yu Zhao Subject: mm/vmscan.c: refactor shrink_node() Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 01:13:22 -0600 This patch refactors shrink_node() to improve readability for the upcoming changes to mm/vmscan.c. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220815071332.627393-4-yuzhao@google.com Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao Reviewed-by: Barry Song Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin Acked-by: Brian Geffon Acked-by: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) Acked-by: Oleksandr Natalenko Acked-by: Steven Barrett Acked-by: Suleiman Souhlal Tested-by: Daniel Byrne Tested-by: Donald Carr Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte Tested-by: Konstantin Kharlamov Tested-by: Shuang Zhai Tested-by: Sofia Trinh Tested-by: Vaibhav Jain Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Hillf Danton Cc: Jens Axboe Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Michael Larabel Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Qi Zheng Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- mm/vmscan.c | 198 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-) --- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-vmscanc-refactor-shrink_node +++ a/mm/vmscan.c @@ -2728,6 +2728,109 @@ enum scan_balance { SCAN_FILE, }; +static void prepare_scan_count(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc) +{ + unsigned long file; + struct lruvec *target_lruvec; + + target_lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(sc->target_mem_cgroup, pgdat); + + /* + * Flush the memory cgroup stats, so that we read accurate per-memcg + * lruvec stats for heuristics. + */ + mem_cgroup_flush_stats(); + + /* + * Determine the scan balance between anon and file LRUs. + */ + spin_lock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock); + sc->anon_cost = target_lruvec->anon_cost; + sc->file_cost = target_lruvec->file_cost; + spin_unlock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock); + + /* + * Target desirable inactive:active list ratios for the anon + * and file LRU lists. + */ + if (!sc->force_deactivate) { + unsigned long refaults; + + /* + * When refaults are being observed, it means a new + * workingset is being established. Deactivate to get + * rid of any stale active pages quickly. + */ + refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, + WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_ANON); + if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[WORKINGSET_ANON] || + inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON)) + sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_ANON; + else + sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_ANON; + + refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, + WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_FILE); + if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[WORKINGSET_FILE] || + inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE)) + sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_FILE; + else + sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_FILE; + } else + sc->may_deactivate = DEACTIVATE_ANON | DEACTIVATE_FILE; + + /* + * If we have plenty of inactive file pages that aren't + * thrashing, try to reclaim those first before touching + * anonymous pages. + */ + file = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, NR_INACTIVE_FILE); + if (file >> sc->priority && !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_FILE)) + sc->cache_trim_mode = 1; + else + sc->cache_trim_mode = 0; + + /* + * Prevent the reclaimer from falling into the cache trap: as + * cache pages start out inactive, every cache fault will tip + * the scan balance towards the file LRU. And as the file LRU + * shrinks, so does the window for rotation from references. + * This means we have a runaway feedback loop where a tiny + * thrashing file LRU becomes infinitely more attractive than + * anon pages. Try to detect this based on file LRU size. + */ + if (!cgroup_reclaim(sc)) { + unsigned long total_high_wmark = 0; + unsigned long free, anon; + int z; + + free = sum_zone_node_page_state(pgdat->node_id, NR_FREE_PAGES); + file = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) + + node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_FILE); + + for (z = 0; z < MAX_NR_ZONES; z++) { + struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[z]; + + if (!managed_zone(zone)) + continue; + + total_high_wmark += high_wmark_pages(zone); + } + + /* + * Consider anon: if that's low too, this isn't a + * runaway file reclaim problem, but rather just + * extreme pressure. Reclaim as per usual then. + */ + anon = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_ANON); + + sc->file_is_tiny = + file + free <= total_high_wmark && + !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_ANON) && + anon >> sc->priority; + } +} + /* * Determine how aggressively the anon and file LRU lists should be * scanned. @@ -3195,109 +3298,16 @@ static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned; struct lruvec *target_lruvec; bool reclaimable = false; - unsigned long file; target_lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(sc->target_mem_cgroup, pgdat); again: - /* - * Flush the memory cgroup stats, so that we read accurate per-memcg - * lruvec stats for heuristics. - */ - mem_cgroup_flush_stats(); - memset(&sc->nr, 0, sizeof(sc->nr)); nr_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed; nr_scanned = sc->nr_scanned; - /* - * Determine the scan balance between anon and file LRUs. - */ - spin_lock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock); - sc->anon_cost = target_lruvec->anon_cost; - sc->file_cost = target_lruvec->file_cost; - spin_unlock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock); - - /* - * Target desirable inactive:active list ratios for the anon - * and file LRU lists. - */ - if (!sc->force_deactivate) { - unsigned long refaults; - - /* - * When refaults are being observed, it means a new - * workingset is being established. Deactivate to get - * rid of any stale active pages quickly. - */ - refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, - WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_ANON); - if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[WORKINGSET_ANON] || - inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON)) - sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_ANON; - else - sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_ANON; - - refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, - WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_FILE); - if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[WORKINGSET_FILE] || - inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE)) - sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_FILE; - else - sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_FILE; - } else - sc->may_deactivate = DEACTIVATE_ANON | DEACTIVATE_FILE; - - /* - * If we have plenty of inactive file pages that aren't - * thrashing, try to reclaim those first before touching - * anonymous pages. - */ - file = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, NR_INACTIVE_FILE); - if (file >> sc->priority && !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_FILE)) - sc->cache_trim_mode = 1; - else - sc->cache_trim_mode = 0; - - /* - * Prevent the reclaimer from falling into the cache trap: as - * cache pages start out inactive, every cache fault will tip - * the scan balance towards the file LRU. And as the file LRU - * shrinks, so does the window for rotation from references. - * This means we have a runaway feedback loop where a tiny - * thrashing file LRU becomes infinitely more attractive than - * anon pages. Try to detect this based on file LRU size. - */ - if (!cgroup_reclaim(sc)) { - unsigned long total_high_wmark = 0; - unsigned long free, anon; - int z; - - free = sum_zone_node_page_state(pgdat->node_id, NR_FREE_PAGES); - file = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) + - node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_FILE); - - for (z = 0; z < MAX_NR_ZONES; z++) { - struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[z]; - if (!managed_zone(zone)) - continue; - - total_high_wmark += high_wmark_pages(zone); - } - - /* - * Consider anon: if that's low too, this isn't a - * runaway file reclaim problem, but rather just - * extreme pressure. Reclaim as per usual then. - */ - anon = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_ANON); - - sc->file_is_tiny = - file + free <= total_high_wmark && - !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_ANON) && - anon >> sc->priority; - } + prepare_scan_count(pgdat, sc); shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from yuzhao@google.com are mm-x86-arm64-add-arch_has_hw_pte_young.patch mm-x86-add-config_arch_has_nonleaf_pmd_young.patch mm-vmscanc-refactor-shrink_node.patch revert-include-linux-mm_inlineh-fold-__update_lru_size-into-its-sole-caller.patch mm-multi-gen-lru-groundwork.patch mm-multi-gen-lru-minimal-implementation.patch mm-multi-gen-lru-exploit-locality-in-rmap.patch mm-multi-gen-lru-support-page-table-walks.patch mm-multi-gen-lru-optimize-multiple-memcgs.patch mm-multi-gen-lru-kill-switch.patch mm-multi-gen-lru-thrashing-prevention.patch mm-multi-gen-lru-debugfs-interface.patch mm-multi-gen-lru-admin-guide.patch mm-multi-gen-lru-design-doc.patch