From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 1/2] bpf: propagate nullness information for reg to reg comparisons
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 12:43:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220822094312.175448-2-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220822094312.175448-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
Propagate nullness information for branches of register to register
equality compare instructions. The following rules are used:
- suppose register A maybe null
- suppose register B is not null
- for JNE A, B, ... - A is not null in the false branch
- for JEQ A, B, ... - A is not null in the true branch
E.g. for program like below:
r6 = skb->sk;
r7 = sk_fullsock(r6);
r0 = sk_fullsock(r6);
if (r0 == 0) return 0; (a)
if (r0 != r7) return 0; (b)
*r7->type; (c)
return 0;
It is safe to dereference r7 at point (c), because of (a) and (b).
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 2c1f8069f7b7..c48d34625bfd 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -472,6 +472,11 @@ static bool type_may_be_null(u32 type)
return type & PTR_MAYBE_NULL;
}
+static bool type_is_pointer(enum bpf_reg_type type)
+{
+ return type != NOT_INIT && type != SCALAR_VALUE;
+}
+
static bool is_acquire_function(enum bpf_func_id func_id,
const struct bpf_map *map)
{
@@ -10046,6 +10051,7 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct bpf_verifier_state *other_branch;
struct bpf_reg_state *regs = this_branch->frame[this_branch->curframe]->regs;
struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg, *other_branch_regs, *src_reg = NULL;
+ struct bpf_reg_state *eq_branch_regs;
u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
bool is_jmp32;
int pred = -1;
@@ -10155,7 +10161,7 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
/* detect if we are comparing against a constant value so we can adjust
* our min/max values for our dst register.
* this is only legit if both are scalars (or pointers to the same
- * object, I suppose, but we don't support that right now), because
+ * object, I suppose, see the next if block), because
* otherwise the different base pointers mean the offsets aren't
* comparable.
*/
@@ -10199,6 +10205,37 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
opcode, is_jmp32);
}
+ /* if one pointer register is compared to another pointer
+ * register check if PTR_MAYBE_NULL could be lifted.
+ * E.g. register A - maybe null
+ * register B - not null
+ * for JNE A, B, ... - A is not null in the false branch;
+ * for JEQ A, B, ... - A is not null in the true branch.
+ */
+ if (!is_jmp32 &&
+ BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X &&
+ type_is_pointer(src_reg->type) && type_is_pointer(dst_reg->type) &&
+ type_may_be_null(src_reg->type) != type_may_be_null(dst_reg->type)) {
+ eq_branch_regs = NULL;
+ switch (opcode) {
+ case BPF_JEQ:
+ eq_branch_regs = other_branch_regs;
+ break;
+ case BPF_JNE:
+ eq_branch_regs = regs;
+ break;
+ default:
+ /* do nothing */
+ break;
+ }
+ if (eq_branch_regs) {
+ if (type_may_be_null(src_reg->type))
+ mark_ptr_not_null_reg(&eq_branch_regs[insn->src_reg]);
+ else
+ mark_ptr_not_null_reg(&eq_branch_regs[insn->dst_reg]);
+ }
+ }
+
if (dst_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && dst_reg->id &&
!WARN_ON_ONCE(dst_reg->id != other_branch_regs[insn->dst_reg].id)) {
find_equal_scalars(this_branch, dst_reg);
--
2.37.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-22 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-22 9:43 [PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/2] propagate nullness information for reg to reg comparisons Eduard Zingerman
2022-08-22 9:43 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2022-08-23 23:15 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 1/2] bpf: " John Fastabend
2022-08-24 22:05 ` Eduard Zingerman
2022-08-25 6:21 ` John Fastabend
2022-08-25 22:31 ` Eduard Zingerman
2022-08-25 2:55 ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-25 6:19 ` John Fastabend
2022-08-25 2:34 ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-22 9:43 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: check nullness propagation " Eduard Zingerman
2022-08-25 2:38 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220822094312.175448-2-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.