From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bmailout3.hostsharing.net (bmailout3.hostsharing.net [176.9.242.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F4833D6D for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 14:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h08.hostsharing.net (h08.hostsharing.net [83.223.95.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "*.hostsharing.net", Issuer "RapidSSL TLS DV RSA Mixed SHA256 2020 CA-1" (verified OK)) by bmailout3.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83C84100D585B; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 16:03:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by h08.hostsharing.net (Postfix, from userid 100393) id 55A4952672; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 16:03:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 16:03:03 +0200 From: Lukas Wunner To: Urja Rannikko Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [regression] build failure of smsc95xx since 5.15.61 Message-ID: <20220826140303.GA31167@wunner.de> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 04:55:55PM +0300, Urja Rannikko wrote: > Here's the relevant bit of the build log: > drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c: In function "smsc95xx_status": > drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c:625:3: error: implicit declaration of > function "generic_handle_domain_irq"; did you mean > "generic_handle_irq"? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] [...] > The build is for 32-bit x86, the defconfig can be found here: > https://github.com/urjaman/i586con/blob/master/brext/board/linux.config > > The build failure also happens with 5.15.62 and 63. I've already asked Sasha & Greg for a revert today: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220826132137.GA24932@wunner.de This was backported to stable kernels although it wasn't tagged for stable. You're the third person reporting breakage to me because of it: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YwaqZ1+zm78vl4L1@sirena.org.uk/ https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/5145 Thanks, Lukas