From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] pipeline: make the hash function configurable per table
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:23:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220831092320.64a3a42a@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220819195225.1483020-1-cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 19:52:19 +0000
Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> wrote:
> Also, since this flexibility has some performance cost, this patch set
> also introduces key comparison functions specialized for each key size
> value. Since the key size is fixed for each table, the key comparison
> function can be selected at initialization as opposed to using a
> generic function that can handle any key size. This strategy result in
> a performance improvement for the table lookup operation of around 5%.
I wonder if DPDK should start to adopt the Linux kernel optimizations
around indirect calls. For most all cases, the function pointer will be
a certain value and the cpu can do direct rather than indirect call.
As in:
if (likely(hash_func == crc32_hash))
crc32_hash(x, y)
else
(*hash_func)(x, y)
This was done in Linux kernel because of the overhead of the Spectre/Meltdown
mitigation's, but could apply more generally in DPDK.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-31 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-18 11:44 [PATCH 0/6] pipeline: make the hash function configurable per table Cristian Dumitrescu
2022-08-18 11:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] table: add hash function prototype Cristian Dumitrescu
2022-08-18 11:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] table: add key comparison functions Cristian Dumitrescu
2022-08-18 11:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] table: configure the hash function for regular tables Cristian Dumitrescu
2022-08-18 11:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] pipeline: " Cristian Dumitrescu
2022-08-18 11:44 ` [PATCH 5/6] table: configure the hash function for learner tables Cristian Dumitrescu
2022-08-18 11:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] pipeline: " Cristian Dumitrescu
2022-08-19 19:52 ` [PATCH V2 0/6] pipeline: make the hash function configurable per table Cristian Dumitrescu
2022-08-19 19:52 ` [PATCH V2 1/6] table: add hash function prototype Cristian Dumitrescu
2022-08-19 19:52 ` [PATCH V2 2/6] table: add key comparison functions Cristian Dumitrescu
2022-08-19 19:52 ` [PATCH V2 3/6] table: configure the hash function for regular tables Cristian Dumitrescu
2022-08-19 19:52 ` [PATCH V2 4/6] pipeline: " Cristian Dumitrescu
2022-08-19 19:52 ` [PATCH V2 5/6] table: configure the hash function for learner tables Cristian Dumitrescu
2022-08-19 19:52 ` [PATCH V2 6/6] pipeline: " Cristian Dumitrescu
2022-08-31 16:23 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2022-09-01 8:11 ` [PATCH V2 0/6] pipeline: make the hash function configurable per table Morten Brørup
2022-09-23 15:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220831092320.64a3a42a@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.