Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 03/10] spmi: pmic-arb: do not ack and clear peripheral interrupts in cleanup_irq

[Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>]

Quoting Fenglin Wu (2022-06-11 20:24:39)
> From: Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@codeaurora.org>
> 
> Currently, cleanup_irq() is invoked when a peripheral's interrupt
> fires and there is no mapping present in the interrupt domain of
> spmi interrupt controller.
> 
> The cleanup_irq clears the arbiter bit, clears the pmic interrupt
> and disables it at the pmic in that order. The last disable in
> cleanup_irq races with request_irq() in that it stomps over the
> enable issued by request_irq. Fix this by not writing to the pmic
> in cleanup_irq. The latched bit will be left set in the pmic,
> which will not send us more interrupts even if the enable bit
> stays enabled.
> 
> When a client wants to request an interrupt, use the activate
> callback on the irq_domain to clear latched bit. This ensures
> that the latched, if set due to the above changes in cleanup_irq
> or when the bootloader leaves it set, gets cleaned up, paving way
> for upcoming interrupts to trigger.
> 
> With this, there is a possibility of unwanted triggering of
> interrupt right after the latched bit is cleared - the interrupt
> may be left enabled too. To avoid that, clear the enable first
> followed by clearing the latched bit in the activate callback.
> 
> Fixes: 6bc546e71e50 ("spmi: pmic-arb: cleanup unrequested irqs")
> Fixes: 02abec3616c1 ("spmi: pmic-arb: rename pa_xx to pmic_arb_xx and other cleanup")
> Signed-off-by: Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@codeaurora.org>
> [collinsd@codeaurora.org: fix merge conflict]
> Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com>
> ---

Applied to spmi-next