From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu 3/3] rcu: Simplify rcu_init_nohz() cpumask handling
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 11:15:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220901091557.GA101341@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220831181044.2694488-3-paulmck@kernel.org>
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:10:44AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
>
> In kernels built with either CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL=y or
> CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, additional CPUs must be added to rcu_nocb_mask.
> Except that kernels booted without the rcu_nocbs= will not have
> allocated rcu_nocb_mask. And the current rcu_init_nohz() function uses
> its need_rcu_nocb_mask and offload_all local variables to track the
> rcu_nocb and nohz_full state.
>
> But there is a much simpler approach, namely creating a cpumask pointer
> to track the default and then using cpumask_available() to check the
> rcu_nocb_mask state. This commit takes this approach, thereby simplifying
> and shortening the rcu_init_nohz() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 32 +++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> index 0a5f0ef414845..c8167be2288fa 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> @@ -1210,45 +1210,31 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_nocb_cpu_offload);
> void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
> {
> int cpu;
> - bool need_rcu_nocb_mask = false;
> - bool offload_all = false;
> struct rcu_data *rdp;
> + const struct cpumask *cpumask = NULL;
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL)
> - if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup) {
> - need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
> - offload_all = true;
> - }
> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL) */
> -
> -#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> - if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask)) {
> - need_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
> - offload_all = false; /* NO_HZ_FULL has its own mask. */
> - }
> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> + cpumask = cpu_possible_mask;
You're missing the rcu_state.nocb_is_setup check, so
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL will now always override the rcu_nocbs=
parameter (should be the other way around).
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> + if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask))
> + cpumask = tick_nohz_full_mask;
> +#endif
A subtle behaviour difference here too: CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_DEFAULT_ALL will
now override nohz_full=
I don't mind, it's probably what we want in the end, but the changelog should
tell about it, or even better, this should be a separate change.
Thanks.
>
> - if (need_rcu_nocb_mask) {
> + if (cpumask) {
> if (!cpumask_available(rcu_nocb_mask)) {
> if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> pr_info("rcu_nocb_mask allocation failed, callback offloading disabled.\n");
> return;
> }
> }
> +
> + cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, cpumask);
> rcu_state.nocb_is_setup = true;
> }
>
> if (!rcu_state.nocb_is_setup)
> return;
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> - if (tick_nohz_full_running)
> - cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
> -#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> -
> - if (offload_all)
> - cpumask_setall(rcu_nocb_mask);
> -
> if (!cpumask_subset(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask)) {
> pr_info("\tNote: kernel parameter 'rcu_nocbs=', 'nohz_full', or 'isolcpus=' contains nonexistent CPUs.\n");
> cpumask_and(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask,
> --
> 2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-01 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-31 18:10 [PATCH rcu 0/7] Callback-offload (nocb) updates for v6.1 Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-31 18:10 ` [PATCH rcu 1/3] rcu/nocb: Choose the right rcuog/rcuop kthreads to output Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-31 18:10 ` [PATCH rcu 2/3] rcu/nocb: Add CPU number to CPU-{,de}offload failure messages Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-31 18:10 ` [PATCH rcu 3/3] rcu: Simplify rcu_init_nohz() cpumask handling Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-01 9:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2022-09-01 10:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-01 11:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-01 11:36 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-09-01 13:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220901091557.GA101341@lothringen \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.