From: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
coreteam@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] net-next: ip6: fetch inetpeer in ip6frag_init
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 16:48:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220901144810.GA31767@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iLH4nDuOHS-0AzYBYOz4f3byZndKXG3_VefVxUbujJZNg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 03:20:54PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Sorry, this is adding yet another bottleneck, and will make DDOS
> attacks based on fragments more effective.
>
> Whole concept of 'peers' based on IPv6 addresses is rather weak, as
> hosts with IPv6 can easily
> get millions of different 'addresses'.
I understand the problem with the implementation. Since peers don't
carry much weight in IPv6, this patch can be dropped.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-01 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-29 11:46 [PATCH 2/4] net-next: ip6: fetch inetpeer in ip6frag_init Richard Gobert
2022-08-29 22:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-09-01 14:48 ` Richard Gobert [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220901144810.GA31767@debian \
--to=richardbgobert@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stefan@datenfreihafen.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.