Re: [PATCH 7/8] mm/damon: introduce DAMON-based LRU-lists Sorting

[SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>]

On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 09:40:10 +1200 Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 5:11 AM SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Barry,
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 14:21:21 +1200 Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 2:03 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:01 AM SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Users can do data access-aware LRU-lists sorting using 'LRU_PRIO' and
> > > > > 'LRU_DEPRIO' DAMOS actions.  However, finding best parameters including
> > > > > the hotness/coldness thresholds, CPU quota, and watermarks could be
> > > > > challenging for some users.  To make the scheme easy to be used without
> > > > > complex tuning for common situations, this commit implements a static
> > > > > kernel module called 'DAMON_LRU_SORT' using the 'LRU_PRIO' and
> > > > > 'LRU_DEPRIO' DAMOS actions.
> > > > >
> > > > > It proactively sorts LRU-lists using DAMON with conservatively chosen
> > > > > default values of the parameters.  That is, the module under its default
> > > > > parameters will make no harm for common situations but provide some
> > > > > level of efficiency improvements for systems having clear hot/cold
> > > > > access pattern under a level of memory pressure while consuming only a
> > > > > limited small portion of CPU time.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi SeongJae,
> > > While I believe DAMON pro-active reclamation and LRU-SORT can benefit the system
> > > by either swapping out cold pages earlier and sorting LRU lists before
> > > system has high
> > > memory pressure, I am still not convinced the improvement really comes from the
> > > identification of cold and hot pages by DAMON.
> > >
> > > My guess is that even if we randomly pick some regions in memory and do the same
> > > thing in the kernel, we can also see the improvement.
> > >
> > > As we actually depend on two facts to benefit from DAMON
> > > 1. locality
> > > while virtual address might have some locality, physical address seems
> > > not. for example,
> > > address A might be mapped by facebook, address A + 4096 could be
> > > mapped by youtube.
> > > There is nothing which can stop contiguous physical addresses from
> > > being mapped by
> > > completely irrelevant applications. so regions based on paddr seems pointless.
> > >
> > > 2. accuration
> > > As I have reported it is very hard for damon to accurately track
> > > virtual address since
> > > virtual space is so huge:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAGsJ_4x_k9009HwpTswEq1ut_co8XYdpZ9k0BVW=0=HRiifxkA@mail.gmail.com/
> > > I believe it is also true for paddr since paddr has much worse
> > > locality than vaddr.
> > > so we probably need a lot of regions, ideally, one region for each page.
> > >
> > > To me, it seems neither of these two facts are true.  So I am more
> > > willing to believe
> > > that the benefits come from areas  picked randomly.
> > >
> > > Am I missing something?
> >
> > Thank you for the questions.
> >
> > As you mentioned, DAMON assumes spatial and temporal locality, to trade
> > accuracy for lower overhead[1].  That is, DAMON believes some memory regions
> > would have pages that accessed in similar frequency for similar time duration.
> > Therefore if the access pattern of the system is really chaotic, that is, if
> > every adjacent page have very different access frequency or the access
> > frequency changes very frequently, DAMON's accuracy would be bad.  But, would
> > such access pattern really common in the real world?  Given the Pareto
> > principle[2], I think that's not always true.  After all, many of kernel
> > mechanisms including the pseudo-LRU-based reclamation and the readahead assumes
> > some locality and makes good effect.
> 
> + yu zhao
> 
> I do believe we have some locality in virtual addresses as they are in
> the same application.
> that is why we can "exploit locality in rmap" here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220815071332.627393-8-yuzhao@google.com/
> 
> But for paddr, i doubt it is true as processes use page faults to get
> pages from buddy
> mainly in low order like zero.

Well, what I can tell for now is that it would depend on the specific system
and workload, but I found some production systems that have such kind of
physical address space locality.

> 
> >
> > If your system has too low locality and therefore DAMON doesn't provide good
> > enough accuracy, you could increase the accuracy by setting the upperbound of
> > the monitoring overhead higher.  For DAMOS schemes like DAMON_RECLAIM or
> > DAMON_LRU_SORT, you could also increase the minimum age of the target access
> > pattern.  If the access pattern is really chaotic, DAMON wouldn't show the
> > regions having the specific access pattern for long time.  Actually, definition
> > of the age and use of it means you believe the system's access pattern is not
> > that chaotic but has at least temporal locality.
> >
> > It's true that DAMON doesn't monitor access pattern in page granularity, and
> > therefore it could report some cold pages as hot, and vice versa.  However, I'd
> > say the benefit of making right decision for huge number of pages outweighs the
> > risk of making wrong decision for few pages in many cases.
> >
> > After all, it shows some benefit on my test environments and some production
> > systems.  I haven't compared that against random pageout or random lru sorting,
> > though.
> >
> > Nevertheless, DAMON has so many rooms for improvement, including the accuracy.
> > I want to improve the accuracy while keeping the overhead low.  Also, I know
> > that there are people who willing to do page-granularity monitoring though it
> > could incur high monitoring overhead.  As a part of the DAMON accuracy
> > improvement plan, to use that as a comparison target, and to convince such
> > people, I added the page granularity monitoring feature of DAMON to my todo
> > list.  I haven't had a time for prioritizing that yet, though, as I haven't
> > heard some clear voice of users for that.  I hope the DAMON Beer/Coffee/Tea
> > Chat Series to be a place to hear such voices.
> 
> is it possible for us to leverage the idea from  "mm: multi-gen LRU:
> support page table walks"
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220815071332.627393-9-yuzhao@google.com/
> 
> we pro-actively scan the virtual address space of those processes
> which have been really
> executed then get LRU sorted earlier?

I didn't read MGLRU patchset thoroughly, but, maybe?


Thanks,
SJ

> 
> >
> > [1] https://docs.kernel.org/mm/damon/design.html#address-space-independent-core-mechanisms
> > [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > SJ
> 
> Thanks
> Barry