All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com, urezki@gmail.com,
	neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com, paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	vineeth@bitbyteword.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/18] rcu: Introduce call_rcu_lazy() API implementation
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 11:40:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220907094014.GA193994@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yxfggt1/cLBhUi/y@google.com>

On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 12:06:26AM +0000, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > @@ -326,13 +372,20 @@ static bool rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> > >   * Note that this function always returns true if rhp is NULL.
> > >   */
> > >  static bool rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> > > -				  unsigned long j)
> > > +				  unsigned long j, unsigned long flush_flags)
> > >  {
> > > +	bool ret;
> > > +
> > >  	if (!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp))
> > >  		return true;
> > >  	rcu_lockdep_assert_cblist_protected(rdp);
> > >  	rcu_nocb_bypass_lock(rdp);
> > > -	return rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(rdp, rhp, j);
> > > +	ret = rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(rdp, rhp, j, flush_flags);
> > > +
> > > +	if (flush_flags & FLUSH_BP_WAKE)
> > > +		wake_nocb_gp(rdp, true);
> > 
> > Why the true above?
> > 
> > Also should we check if the wake up is really necessary (otherwise it means we
> > force a wake up for all rdp's from rcu_barrier())?
> > 
> >        was_alldone = rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist);
> >        ret = rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(rdp, rhp, j, flush_flags);
> >        if (was_alldone && rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist))
> >        	  wake_nocb_gp(rdp, false);
> 
> You mean something like the following right? Though I'm thinking if its
> better to call wake_nocb_gp() from tree.c in entrain() and let that handle
> the wake. That way, we can get rid of the extra FLUSH_BP flags as well and
> let the flush callers deal with the wakeups..

Ah yes that could make sense if only one caller cares.

> 
> Anyway, for testing this should be good...
> 
> ---8<-----------------------
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> index bd8f39ee2cd0..e3344c262672 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> @@ -382,15 +382,19 @@ static bool rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
>  				  unsigned long j, unsigned long flush_flags)
>  {
>  	bool ret;
> +	bool was_alldone;
>  
>  	if (!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp))
>  		return true;
>  	rcu_lockdep_assert_cblist_protected(rdp);
>  	rcu_nocb_bypass_lock(rdp);
> +	if (flush_flags & FLUSH_BP_WAKE)
> +		was_alldone = !rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist);
> +

You can check that outside bypass lock (but you still need nocb_lock).

>  	ret = rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(rdp, rhp, j, flush_flags);
>  
> -	if (flush_flags & FLUSH_BP_WAKE)
> -		wake_nocb_gp(rdp, true);
> +	if (flush_flags & FLUSH_BP_WAKE && was_alldone)
> +		wake_nocb_gp(rdp, false);

That doesn't check if the bypass list was empty.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-07  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-01 22:17 [PATCH v5 00/18] Implement call_rcu_lazy() and miscellaneous fixes Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] mm/slub: perform free consistency checks before call_rcu Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] mm/sl[au]b: rearrange struct slab fields to allow larger rcu_head Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-02  9:26   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-02  9:30     ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-02 15:09       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-03 13:53         ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] rcu/tree: Use READ_ONCE() for lockless read of rnp->qsmask Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-06 22:26   ` Boqun Feng
2022-09-06 22:31     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] rcu: Fix late wakeup when flush of bypass cblist happens Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-02 11:35   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-02 23:58     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-03 15:10       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-04 21:13       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-03 14:04   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-03 14:05     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06  3:07   ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06  9:48     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-07  2:43       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] rcu: Move trace_rcu_callback() before bypassing Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] rcu: Introduce call_rcu_lazy() API implementation Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-02 15:21   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-02 23:09     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-05 12:59       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-05 20:18         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-05 20:32         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06  8:55           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-06 16:16             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06 17:05               ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-03 22:00     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-04 21:01       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-05 20:20         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06  3:05     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06 15:17       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-06 16:15         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06 16:31           ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06 16:38             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06 16:43               ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06 19:11                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-07  2:56                   ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-07  9:56                     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-07 10:03           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-07 14:01             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-07  0:06         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-07  9:40           ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2022-09-07 13:44             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-07 15:38               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-07 15:39                 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-21 23:52             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-22 14:39               ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-06 18:16       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-09-06 18:21         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-07  8:52           ` Uladzislau Rezki
2022-09-07 15:23             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-03 14:03   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-03 14:05     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] rcu: shrinker for lazy rcu Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] rcu: Add per-CB tracing for queuing, flush and invocation Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-02 16:48   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-03 12:39     ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-03 12:39       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-03 14:07       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-03 14:07         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-02 19:01   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] rcuscale: Add laziness and kfree tests Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] rcutorture: Add test code for call_rcu_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] fs: Move call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() in some paths Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] cred: Move call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] security: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] net/core: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] kernel: Move various core kernel usages " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] lib: Move call_rcu() " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] i915: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-01 22:17 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] fork: Move thread_stack_free_rcu() " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-09-03 15:22 ` [PATCH v5 00/18] Implement call_rcu_lazy() and miscellaneous fixes Paul E. McKenney
     [not found]   ` <CAEXW_YTxRWvUN3YuwdJ9WPmHH-v+Auozfc_OugpV_hpxC5K+4Q@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <20220914093423.GS246308@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
     [not found]       ` <20220914102319.GA1936@lothringen>
     [not found]         ` <CA+KHdyUb122cCaeLutzK8Ti-dk4D=iXCtQau=ZXkPRO-1cnD1A@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]           ` <20220914112251.GV246308@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
     [not found]             ` <YygjfJkoUzxy9xd/@pc636>
     [not found]               ` <20220919131152.GF4196@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
     [not found]                 ` <CAEXW_YQGPwkTQjxAb5p4OOhJkMA-L93JNTsa-WaXs0Ts7=Oakw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                   ` <20220919223211.GJ4196@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
     [not found]                     ` <f061b798-e6f6-1523-52c3-12fe7966f809@joelfernandes.org>
     [not found]                       ` <a2882e80-1723-9004-f67a-cd8332aa701d@joelfernandes.org>
     [not found]                         ` <d72808e1-fc27-f158-37b7-ef23c23e74c1@joelfernandes.org>
2022-09-20 11:40                           ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-20 12:32                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-20 17:55                               ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-20 19:03                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-20 22:27                                   ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-20 22:35                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-20 22:40                                       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-21  2:21                                         ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220907094014.GA193994@lothringen \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.