All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, songmuchun@bytedance.com,
	soheil@google.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
	oliver.sang@intel.com, mkoutny@suse.com, mhocko@suse.com,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, feng.tang@intel.com, edumazet@google.com,
	shakeelb@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] memcg-increase-memcg_charge_batch-to-64.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 20:29:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220912032953.B3C0FC433D7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2982 bytes --]


The quilt patch titled
     Subject: memcg: increase MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH to 64
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     memcg-increase-memcg_charge_batch-to-64.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Subject: memcg: increase MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH to 64
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:05:06 +0000

For several years, MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH was kept at 32 but with bigger
machines and the network intensive workloads requiring througput in Gbps,
32 is too small and makes the memcg charging path a bottleneck.  For now,
increase it to 64 for easy acceptance to 6.0.  We will need to revisit
this in future for ever increasing demand of higher performance.

Please note that the memcg charge path drain the per-cpu memcg charge
stock, so there should not be any oom behavior change.  Though it does
have impact on rstat flushing and high limit reclaim backoff.

To evaluate the impact of this optimization, on a 72 CPUs machine, we
ran the following workload in a three level of cgroup hierarchy.

 $ netserver -6
 # 36 instances of netperf with following params
 $ netperf -6 -H ::1 -l 60 -t TCP_SENDFILE -- -m 10K

Results (average throughput of netperf):
Without (6.0-rc1)       10482.7 Mbps
With patch              17064.7 Mbps (62.7% improvement)

With the patch, the throughput improved by 62.7%.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220825000506.239406-4-shakeelb@google.com
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 include/linux/memcontrol.h |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h~memcg-increase-memcg_charge_batch-to-64
+++ a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -354,10 +354,11 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
 };
 
 /*
- * size of first charge trial. "32" comes from vmscan.c's magic value.
- * TODO: maybe necessary to use big numbers in big irons.
+ * size of first charge trial.
+ * TODO: maybe necessary to use big numbers in big irons or dynamic based of the
+ * workload.
  */
-#define MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH 32U
+#define MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH 64U
 
 extern struct mem_cgroup *root_mem_cgroup;
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from shakeelb@google.com are

mm-deduplicate-cacheline-padding-code.patch
memcg-extract-memcg_vmstats-from-struct-mem_cgroup.patch
memcg-rearrange-code.patch
memcg-reduce-size-of-memcg-vmstats-structures.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2022-09-12  3:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220912032953.B3C0FC433D7@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=soheil@google.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.