Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] powerpc/64s: update generic cpu option name and compiler flags

[Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>]

Hi!

On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 11:01:18AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Wed Sep 21, 2022 at 8:16 AM AEST, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 12:01:47AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > Update the 64s GENERIC_CPU option. POWER4 support has been dropped, so
> > > make that clear in the option name.
> >
> > AFAIR the minimum now is POWER4+ (ISA 2.01), not POWER5 (ISA 2.02).
> 
> It's POWER5 now, because of commit 471d7ff8b5 ("powerpc/64s: Remove
> POWER4 support"), which is misguided about POWER4+ and also introduced
> the -mcpu=power5 bug on 970 builds :\

ISA 2.01 added just a few things (LPES[0], HDEC, some PM things, but
crucially also anything that sets MSR[PR] also sets MSR[EE] since then).

> Not sure it's worth adding POWER4+ support back but if someone has a
> POWER4+ or adds it to QEMU TCG, I will do the patch.

970 is 2.01 -- pretending it is 2.02 is a ticking time bomb: the popcntb
insn will be generated for popcount and parity intrinsics, which can be
generated by generic code!

> > > -mtune= before power8 is dropped because the minimum gcc version
> > > supports power8, and tuning is made consistent between big and little
> > > endian.
> >
> > Tuning for p8 on e.g. 970 gives quite bad results.  No idea if anyone
> > cares, but this is a serious regression if so.
> 
> It's for "generic" kernel so we set low minimum but higher tune,
> assuming that people would usually have newer, so it was already
> doing -mtune=power7.
> 
> We could make a specific 970/G5 entry though, since those still
> have users.

If that uses -mcpu=power4 (which means ISA 2.01 btw!) all is fine
already?  (Or -mcpu=970, same thing really, it just allows VMX as well).

Thanks for taking care of this Nick, much appreciated!


Segher