From: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>, Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] common: Fix file leak in _get_max_file_size
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 13:04:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220923050452.uuvsydbqlcbiphuo@zlang-mailbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yy0oizGOSvd6Z2Yu@sol.localdomain>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 08:31:23PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 03:48:19PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> > This is obviously mostly problematic for FS lacking support for sparse
> > files.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > common/rc | 1 +
> > tests/generic/692 | 0
> > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > mode change 100644 => 100755 tests/generic/692
> >
> > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> > index 228fcb37..c9078649 100644
> > --- a/common/rc
> > +++ b/common/rc
> > @@ -4637,6 +4637,7 @@ _get_max_file_size()
> > l=$m
> > fi
> > done
> > + rm -f $testfile
> > echo $l
> > }
>
> Removing the file is fine, but I didn't have filesystems that lack support for
> sparse files in mind when I wrote this function. Maybe it should look at $FSTYP
> first, and only use the generic algorithm as a fallback for unhandled types?
That might be good idea. The current algorithm takes too long time for fs which
doesn't support sparse file.
Anyway, this $testfile should be removed. If Pavel would like to change this
function likes:
_get_max_file_size()
{
case $FSTYP:
exfat)
# calculate the max file size of exfat according to blocksize, then
echo $max_file_size_of_exfat
;;
# Add ext* if extN forks think it's better
*)
# By default, do the algorithm this function does originally
;;
esac
}
he can split this part as a separated patch, then let's review it. Or we can
have this patch at first, then let Eric change it when he'd like to do that.
Thanks,
Zorro
>
> - Eric
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-23 5:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-22 13:48 [PATCH 1/4] common: Fix file leak in _get_max_file_size Pavel Reichl
2022-09-22 13:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] g/299: speed up the test Pavel Reichl
2022-09-22 15:16 ` Zorro Lang
2022-09-22 13:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] generic: cleanup test files Pavel Reichl
2022-09-22 14:36 ` Zorro Lang
[not found] ` <91ec6d59-5014-2e3e-8e80-aac162b8ffc1@redhat.com>
2022-09-22 15:08 ` Zorro Lang
2022-09-22 17:05 ` Pavel Reichl
2022-09-22 17:58 ` Zorro Lang
2022-09-22 13:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] g/394: clean up " Pavel Reichl
2022-09-22 15:04 ` Zorro Lang
2022-09-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] common: Fix file leak in _get_max_file_size Zorro Lang
2022-09-22 14:51 ` Pavel Reichl
2022-09-23 3:31 ` Eric Biggers
2022-09-23 5:04 ` Zorro Lang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220923050452.uuvsydbqlcbiphuo@zlang-mailbox \
--to=zlang@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=preichl@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.