From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E9B9C04A95 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 07:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235140AbiI2HUL (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2022 03:20:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46858 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235211AbiI2HUA (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2022 03:20:00 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 175D4DF3E for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 00:19:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id C0C8168BFE; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 09:19:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 09:19:50 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Pankaj Raghav Cc: Christoph Hellwig , axboe@kernel.dk, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] block: use blk_mq_plug() wrapper consistently in the block layer Message-ID: <20220929071950.GA821@lst.de> References: <20220929062425.91254-1-p.raghav@samsung.com> <20220929062425.91254-3-p.raghav@samsung.com> <20220929065641.GB31325@lst.de> <72d2f463-a0b1-db96-acb4-28617893407b@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <72d2f463-a0b1-db96-acb4-28617893407b@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 09:15:12AM +0200, Pankaj Raghav wrote: > I mentioned it in the commit header: to use this wrapper consistently > across block layer because I am not sure if either of the changes would > have led to a bug in zoned devices. The only thing that goes into source control is the commit message, so the rationale needs to go into that.