diff for duplicates of <20220929222006.GI3600936@dread.disaster.area> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index d02cb0e..2dc73de 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 07:54:40AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: -> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> +> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> > > This should be more obvious, but gfpflags_allow_blocking() is not > the same thing as a GFP_KERNEL reclaim contexts. The former checks @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 07:54:40AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > reclaim doesn't cause deadlocks. This makes the reclaim deadlocks in > the test I've been running go away. > -> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> +> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> FWIW: @@ -78,4 +78,4 @@ Fixes: b3ff92916af3 ("mm, memcg: reclaim more aggressively before high allocator -Dave. -- Dave Chinner -david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org +david@fromorbit.com diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 2abb2c0..73fcfd6 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,15 +1,14 @@ "ref\020220929215440.1967887-1-david@fromorbit.com\0" - "ref\020220929215440.1967887-1-david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Dave Chinner <david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>\0" + "From\0Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] memcg: calling reclaim_high(GFP_KERNEL) in GFP_NOFS context deadlocks\0" "Date\0Fri, 30 Sep 2022 08:20:06 +1000\0" - "To\0cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\0" - "Cc\0linux-mm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" - " linux-xfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\0" + "To\0cgroups@vger.kernel.org\0" + "Cc\0linux-mm@vger.kernel.org" + " linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 07:54:40AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:\n" - "> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\n" + "> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>\n" "> \n" "> This should be more obvious, but gfpflags_allow_blocking() is not\n" "> the same thing as a GFP_KERNEL reclaim contexts. The former checks\n" @@ -79,7 +78,7 @@ "> reclaim doesn't cause deadlocks. This makes the reclaim deadlocks in\n" "> the test I've been running go away.\n" "> \n" - "> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\n" + "> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>\n" "\n" "FWIW:\n" "\n" @@ -88,6 +87,6 @@ "-Dave.\n" "-- \n" "Dave Chinner\n" - david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org + david@fromorbit.com -d9befd82d3672114629d705f115e94df669cdd0be3dcdf2fc3f0508bf890a243 +0abed1deee4c040c1e264a4ad267e31dccf28c433093605ecba71cc00101bf9c
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.