From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
quic_neeraju@quicinc.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] srcu: Warn when NMI-unsafe API is used in NMI
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 19:22:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221013172244.1099010-2-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221013172244.1099010-1-frederic@kernel.org>
Using the NMI-unsafe reader API from within NMIs is very likely to be
buggy for three reasons:
1) NMIs aren't strictly re-entrant (a pending nested NMI will execute
at the end of the current one) so it should be fine to use a
non-atomic increment here. However breakpoints can still interrupt
NMIs and if a breakpoint callback has a reader on that same ssp, a
racy increment can happen.
2) If the only reader site for a given ssp is in an NMI, RCU is definetly
a better choice over SRCU.
3) Because of the previous reason (2), an ssp having an SRCU read side
critical section in an NMI is likely to have another one from a task
context.
For all these reasons, warn if an nmi unsafe reader API is used from an
NMI.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index c54142374793..8b7ef1031d89 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -642,6 +642,8 @@ static void srcu_check_nmi_safety(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool nmi_safe)
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU))
return;
+ /* NMI-unsafe use in NMI is a bad sign */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!nmi_safe && in_nmi());
sdp = raw_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda);
old_nmi_safe_mask = READ_ONCE(sdp->srcu_nmi_safety);
if (!old_nmi_safe_mask) {
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-13 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-13 17:22 [PATCH 0/3] srcu: A few NMI-safe debugging updates Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-13 17:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2022-10-14 22:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] srcu: Warn when NMI-unsafe API is used in NMI Joel Fernandes
2022-10-20 22:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] srcu: Explain the reason behind the read side critical section on GP start Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] srcu: Debug NMI safety even on archs that don't require it Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-14 18:35 ` [PATCH 0/3] srcu: A few NMI-safe debugging updates Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221013172244.1099010-2-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.