From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: guoren@kernel.org
Cc: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
yury.norov@gmail.com, caraitto@google.com, willemb@google.com,
jonolson@google.com, amritha.nambiar@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] net: Fixup netif_attrmask_next_and warning
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 20:35:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221013203544.110a143c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221014030459.3272206-2-guoren@kernel.org>
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 23:04:58 -0400 guoren@kernel.org wrote:
> - for (j = -1; j = netif_attrmask_next_and(j, online_mask, mask, nr_ids),
> - j < nr_ids;) {
> + for (j = -1; j < nr_ids;
> + j = netif_attrmask_next_and(j, online_mask, mask, nr_ids)) {
This does not look equivalent, have you tested it?
nr_ids is unsigned, doesn't it mean we'll never enter the loop?
Can we instead revert 854701ba4c and take the larger rework Yury
has posted a week ago into net-next?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-14 3:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-14 3:04 [PATCH V2 0/2] net: Fixup cpu_mask usage guoren
2022-10-14 3:04 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] net: Fixup netif_attrmask_next_and warning guoren
2022-10-14 3:35 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-10-14 3:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-14 4:42 ` Yury Norov
2022-10-14 6:42 ` Guo Ren
2022-10-14 16:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-14 16:16 ` Yury Norov
2022-10-14 18:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-15 1:41 ` Guo Ren
2022-10-14 6:38 ` Guo Ren
2022-10-14 15:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-15 1:38 ` Guo Ren
2022-10-14 10:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-14 10:04 ` Guo Ren
2022-10-14 3:04 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] net: Fixup virtnet_set_affinity() cause cpumask warning guoren
2022-10-14 10:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-14 10:04 ` Guo Ren
2022-10-17 1:58 ` Xuan Zhuo
2022-10-17 2:46 ` Guo Ren
2022-10-17 2:58 ` Xuan Zhuo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221013203544.110a143c@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=caraitto@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jonolson@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.