All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
	Charlotte Tan <charlotte@extrahop.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] iommu/vt-d: Use rcu_lock in get_resv_regions
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 08:44:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221019004447.4563-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221019004447.4563-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

Commit 5f64ce5411b46 ("iommu/vt-d: Duplicate iommu_resv_region objects
per device list") converted rcu_lock in get_resv_regions to
dmar_global_lock to allow sleeping in iommu_alloc_resv_region(). This
introduced possible recursive locking if get_resv_regions is called from
within a section where intel_iommu_init() already holds dmar_global_lock.

Especially, after commit 57365a04c921 ("iommu: Move bus setup to IOMMU
device registration"), below lockdep splats could always be seen.

 ============================================
 WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
 6.0.0-rc4+ #325 Tainted: G          I
 --------------------------------------------
 swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffffffffa8a18c90 (dmar_global_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at:
 intel_iommu_get_resv_regions+0x25/0x270

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffffffffa8a18c90 (dmar_global_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at:
 intel_iommu_init+0x36d/0x6ea

 ...

 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x5f
  __lock_acquire.cold.73+0xad/0x2bb
  lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2e0
  ? intel_iommu_get_resv_regions+0x25/0x270
  ? lock_is_held_type+0x9d/0x110
  down_read+0x42/0x150
  ? intel_iommu_get_resv_regions+0x25/0x270
  intel_iommu_get_resv_regions+0x25/0x270
  iommu_create_device_direct_mappings.isra.28+0x8d/0x1c0
  ? iommu_get_dma_cookie+0x6d/0x90
  bus_iommu_probe+0x19f/0x2e0
  iommu_device_register+0xd4/0x130
  intel_iommu_init+0x3e1/0x6ea
  ? iommu_setup+0x289/0x289
  ? rdinit_setup+0x34/0x34
  pci_iommu_init+0x12/0x3a
  do_one_initcall+0x65/0x320
  ? rdinit_setup+0x34/0x34
  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x5a/0x80
  kernel_init_freeable+0x28a/0x2f3
  ? rest_init+0x1b0/0x1b0
  kernel_init+0x1a/0x130
  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
  </TASK>

This rolls back dmar_global_lock to rcu_lock in get_resv_regions to avoid
the lockdep splat.

Fixes: 57365a04c921 ("iommu: Move bus setup to IOMMU device registration")
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220927053109.4053662-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index d5965b4f8b60..b3cf0f991e29 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -4534,7 +4534,7 @@ static void intel_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *device,
 	struct device *i_dev;
 	int i;
 
-	down_read(&dmar_global_lock);
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	for_each_rmrr_units(rmrr) {
 		for_each_active_dev_scope(rmrr->devices, rmrr->devices_cnt,
 					  i, i_dev) {
@@ -4553,14 +4553,14 @@ static void intel_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *device,
 
 			resv = iommu_alloc_resv_region(rmrr->base_address,
 						       length, prot, type,
-						       GFP_KERNEL);
+						       GFP_ATOMIC);
 			if (!resv)
 				break;
 
 			list_add_tail(&resv->list, head);
 		}
 	}
-	up_read(&dmar_global_lock);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_FLOPPY_WA
 	if (dev_is_pci(device)) {
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-19  0:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-19  0:44 [PATCH 0/4] [PULL REQUEST] iommu/vt-d: Fixes for v6.1-rc2 Lu Baolu
2022-10-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] iommu: Add gfp parameter to iommu_alloc_resv_region Lu Baolu
2022-10-19  0:44 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2022-10-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] iommu/vt-d: Allow NVS regions in arch_rmrr_sanity_check() Lu Baolu
2022-10-19  0:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] iommu/vt-d: Clean up si_domain in the init_dmars() error path Lu Baolu
2022-10-21  8:49 ` [PATCH 0/4] [PULL REQUEST] iommu/vt-d: Fixes for v6.1-rc2 Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221019004447.4563-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=charlotte@extrahop.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.