From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
stable@vger.kernel.org, riel@surriel.com, peterx@redhat.com,
naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev, harperchen1110@gmail.com,
david@redhat.com, axelrasmussen@google.com,
almasrymina@google.com, mike.kravetz@oracle.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [to-be-updated] hugetlb-dont-delete-vma_lock-in-hugetlb-madv_dontneed-processing.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:33:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221028213358.A312CC433D6@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: hugetlb: don't delete vma_lock in hugetlb MADV_DONTNEED processing
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
hugetlb-dont-delete-vma_lock-in-hugetlb-madv_dontneed-processing.patch
This patch was dropped because an updated version will be merged
------------------------------------------------------
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Subject: hugetlb: don't delete vma_lock in hugetlb MADV_DONTNEED processing
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 19:50:47 -0700
madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) ends up calling zap_page_range() to clear the page
tables associated with the address range. For hugetlb vmas,
zap_page_range will call __unmap_hugepage_range_final. However,
__unmap_hugepage_range_final assumes the passed vma is about to be removed
and deletes the vma_lock to prevent pmd sharing as the vma is on the way
out. In the case of madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) the vma remains, but the
missing vma_lock prevents pmd sharing and could potentially lead to issues
with truncation/fault races.
This issue was originally reported here [1] as a BUG triggered in
page_try_dup_anon_rmap. Prior to the introduction of the hugetlb
vma_lock, __unmap_hugepage_range_final cleared the VM_MAYSHARE flag to
prevent pmd sharing. Subsequent faults on this vma were confused as
VM_MAYSHARE indicates a sharable vma, but was not set so page_mapping was
not set in new pages added to the page table. This resulted in pages that
appeared anonymous in a VM_SHARED vma and triggered the BUG.
Create a new routine clear_hugetlb_page_range() that can be called from
madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) for hugetlb vmas. It has the same setup as
zap_page_range, but does not delete the vma_lock.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAO4mrfdLMXsao9RF4fUE8-Wfde8xmjsKrTNMNC9wjUb6JudD0g@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221023025047.470646-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Fixes: 90e7e7f5ef3f ("mm: enable MADV_DONTNEED for hugetlb mappings")
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Wei Chen <harperchen1110@gmail.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/hugetlb.h | 7 ++++
mm/hugetlb.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
mm/madvise.c | 5 ++-
3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h~hugetlb-dont-delete-vma_lock-in-hugetlb-madv_dontneed-processing
+++ a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
@@ -156,6 +156,8 @@ long follow_hugetlb_page(struct mm_struc
void unmap_hugepage_range(struct vm_area_struct *,
unsigned long, unsigned long, struct page *,
zap_flags_t);
+void clear_hugetlb_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
void __unmap_hugepage_range_final(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
@@ -460,6 +462,11 @@ static inline void __unmap_hugepage_rang
BUG();
}
+static void __maybe_unused clear_hugetlb_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+{
+}
+
static inline vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
unsigned int flags)
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~hugetlb-dont-delete-vma_lock-in-hugetlb-madv_dontneed-processing
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -5194,28 +5194,66 @@ static void __unmap_hugepage_range(struc
tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb);
}
-void __unmap_hugepage_range_final(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
+static void __unmap_hugepage_range_locking(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
unsigned long end, struct page *ref_page,
- zap_flags_t zap_flags)
+ zap_flags_t zap_flags, bool final)
{
hugetlb_vma_lock_write(vma);
i_mmap_lock_write(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
__unmap_hugepage_range(tlb, vma, start, end, ref_page, zap_flags);
- /*
- * Unlock and free the vma lock before releasing i_mmap_rwsem. When
- * the vma_lock is freed, this makes the vma ineligible for pmd
- * sharing. And, i_mmap_rwsem is required to set up pmd sharing.
- * This is important as page tables for this unmapped range will
- * be asynchrously deleted. If the page tables are shared, there
- * will be issues when accessed by someone else.
- */
- __hugetlb_vma_unlock_write_free(vma);
+ if (final) {
+ /*
+ * Unlock and free the vma lock before releasing i_mmap_rwsem.
+ * When the vma_lock is freed, this makes the vma ineligible
+ * for pmd sharing. And, i_mmap_rwsem is required to set up
+ * pmd sharing. This is important as page tables for this
+ * unmapped range will be asynchrously deleted. If the page
+ * tables are shared, there will be issues when accessed by
+ * someone else.
+ */
+ __hugetlb_vma_unlock_write_free(vma);
+ i_mmap_unlock_write(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
+ } else {
+ i_mmap_unlock_write(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
+ hugetlb_vma_unlock_write(vma);
+ }
+}
+
+void __unmap_hugepage_range_final(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
+ unsigned long end, struct page *ref_page,
+ zap_flags_t zap_flags)
+{
+ __unmap_hugepage_range_locking(tlb, vma, start, end, ref_page,
+ zap_flags, true);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ADVISE_SYSCALLS
+/*
+ * Similar setup as in zap_page_range(). madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) can not call
+ * zap_page_range for hugetlb vmas as __unmap_hugepage_range_final will delete
+ * the associated vma_lock.
+ */
+void clear_hugetlb_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
+ unsigned long end)
+{
+ struct mmu_notifier_range range;
+ struct mmu_gather tlb;
+
+ mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, vma, vma->vm_mm,
+ start, end);
+ tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, vma->vm_mm);
+ update_hiwater_rss(vma->vm_mm);
+
+ __unmap_hugepage_range_locking(&tlb, vma, start, end, NULL, 0, false);
- i_mmap_unlock_write(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
+ mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
+ tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
}
+#endif
void unmap_hugepage_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
unsigned long end, struct page *ref_page,
--- a/mm/madvise.c~hugetlb-dont-delete-vma_lock-in-hugetlb-madv_dontneed-processing
+++ a/mm/madvise.c
@@ -790,7 +790,10 @@ static int madvise_free_single_vma(struc
static long madvise_dontneed_single_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
- zap_page_range(vma, start, end - start);
+ if (!is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
+ zap_page_range(vma, start, end - start);
+ else
+ clear_hugetlb_page_range(vma, start, end);
return 0;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from mike.kravetz@oracle.com are
hugetlb-simplify-hugetlb-handling-in-follow_page_mask.patch
hugetlb-simplify-hugetlb-handling-in-follow_page_mask-v4.patch
next reply other threads:[~2022-10-28 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-28 21:33 Andrew Morton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-11-01 19:16 [to-be-updated] hugetlb-dont-delete-vma_lock-in-hugetlb-madv_dontneed-processing.patch removed from -mm tree Andrew Morton
2022-11-11 22:59 Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221028213358.A312CC433D6@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=harperchen1110@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.