Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] hw/i386/acpi-build: Resolve north rather than south bridges

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:18:43PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 9:45 PM B <shentey@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 28. Oktober 2022 10:58:07 UTC schrieb Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>:
> > >On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 4:05 PM Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The code currently assumes Q35 iff ICH9 and i440fx iff PIIX. Now that more
> > >> AML generation has been moved into the south bridges and since the
> > >> machines define themselves primarily through their north bridges, let's
> > >> switch to resolving the north bridges for AML generation instead. This
> > >> also allows for easier experimentation with different south bridges in
> > >> the "pc" machine, e.g. with PIIX4 and VT82xx.
> > >
> > >Unfortunately this patch does not apply on the latest master. Also the
> > >code seems to be off. Can you rebase and rework the patch?
> >
> > I've rebased onto Igor's series to avoid merge conflicts,
> 
> Ok I will let Igor deal with this then since I have not followed his patchset.

should you want to review this, it's all in my tree right now.

> > that's why it doesn't apply onto master. It applies fine there [1].
> >
> > The first two patches of this series apply fine on both branches, so could possibly be pulled already if Igor's series doesn't make it for 7.2.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Bernhard
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu/commits/patchew/20221028103419.93398-1-shentey%40gmail.com
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>  hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 11 ++++++-----
> > >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > >> index 73d8a59737..d9eaa5fc4d 100644
> > >> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > >> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > >> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
> > >>  #include "hw/i386/fw_cfg.h"
> > >>  #include "hw/i386/ich9.h"
> > >>  #include "hw/pci/pci_bus.h"
> > >> +#include "hw/pci-host/i440fx.h"
> > >>  #include "hw/pci-host/q35.h"
> > >>  #include "hw/i386/x86-iommu.h"
> > >>
> > >> @@ -1322,8 +1323,8 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> > >>             AcpiPmInfo *pm, AcpiMiscInfo *misc,
> > >>             Range *pci_hole, Range *pci_hole64, MachineState *machine)
> > >>  {
> > >> -    Object *piix = object_resolve_type_unambiguous(TYPE_PIIX4_PM);
> > >> -    Object *lpc = object_resolve_type_unambiguous(TYPE_ICH9_LPC_DEVICE);
> > >> +    Object *i440fx = object_resolve_type_unambiguous(TYPE_I440FX_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE);
> > >> +    Object *q35 = object_resolve_type_unambiguous(TYPE_Q35_HOST_DEVICE);
> > >>      CrsRangeEntry *entry;
> > >>      Aml *dsdt, *sb_scope, *scope, *dev, *method, *field, *pkg, *crs;
> > >>      CrsRangeSet crs_range_set;
> > >> @@ -1344,13 +1345,13 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> > >>      AcpiTable table = { .sig = "DSDT", .rev = 1, .oem_id = x86ms->oem_id,
> > >>                          .oem_table_id = x86ms->oem_table_id };
> > >>
> > >> -    assert(!!piix != !!lpc);
> > >> +    assert(!!i440fx != !!q35);
> > >>
> > >>      acpi_table_begin(&table, table_data);
> > >>      dsdt = init_aml_allocator();
> > >>
> > >>      build_dbg_aml(dsdt);
> > >> -    if (piix) {
> > >> +    if (i440fx) {
> > >>          sb_scope = aml_scope("_SB");
> > >>          dev = aml_device("PCI0");
> > >>          aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_eisaid("PNP0A03")));
> > >> @@ -1363,7 +1364,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> > >>              build_x86_acpi_pci_hotplug(dsdt, pm->pcihp_io_base);
> > >>          }
> > >>          build_piix4_pci0_int(dsdt);
> > >> -    } else if (lpc) {
> > >> +    } else if (q35) {
> > >>          sb_scope = aml_scope("_SB");
> > >>          dev = aml_device("PCI0");
> > >>          aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_eisaid("PNP0A08")));
> > >> --
> > >> 2.38.1
> > >>