From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/17] nvme: don't call nvme_kill_queues from nvme_remove_namespaces
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 10:22:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221030092208.GC5643@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1ggN68V/mbAw1q2@kbusch-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 11:43:19AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> We still need the flush_work(scan_work) prior to killing the queues.
Yes.
> It
> looks like it could safely be moved to nvme_stop_ctrl(), which might
> make it easier on everyone if it were there.
Hmm. As Sagi pointed out this could become a bit more complicated due
to multipath, but in general I'd love to bring some more regularity
into the teardown path.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-30 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-25 14:40 per-tagset SRCU struct and quiesce v2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 01/17] block: set the disk capacity to 0 in blk_mark_disk_dead Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-26 12:39 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 02/17] nvme-pci: refactor the tagset handling in nvme_reset_work Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-26 12:46 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-30 9:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 03/17] nvme-pci: don't warn about the lack of I/O queues for admin controllers Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-26 12:49 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-30 9:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 04/17] nvme: don't call nvme_kill_queues from nvme_remove_namespaces Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-25 17:43 ` Keith Busch
2022-10-25 20:17 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-30 9:22 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 05/17] nvme: don't remove namespaces in nvme_passthru_end Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-26 12:50 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 06/17] nvme: remove the NVME_NS_DEAD check in nvme_remove_invalid_namespaces Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-26 12:50 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 07/17] nvme: remove the NVME_NS_DEAD check in nvme_validate_ns Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-26 12:52 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-30 9:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 08/17] nvme: don't unquiesce the admin queue in nvme_kill_queues Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-26 12:53 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 09/17] nvme: don't unquiesce the I/O queues " Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-26 12:54 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 10/17] nvme-pci: mark the namespaces dead earlier in nvme_remove Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-25 18:53 ` Keith Busch
2022-10-26 12:55 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-26 12:57 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 11/17] nvme-pci: don't unquiesce the I/O queues in nvme_remove_dead_ctrl Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-26 8:34 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-26 12:58 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-27 2:46 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 12/17] nvme-pci: don't unquiesce the I/O queues in apple_nvme_reset_work Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-26 8:37 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-26 12:58 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 13/17] blk-mq: skip non-mq queues in blk_mq_quiesce_queue Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 14/17] blk-mq: move the srcu_struct used for quiescing to the tagset Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-26 8:48 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-26 13:01 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-27 2:49 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-27 10:02 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 15/17] blk-mq: pass a tagset to blk_mq_wait_quiesce_done Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 16/17] blk-mq: add tagset quiesce interface Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-26 8:51 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-26 13:02 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-25 14:40 ` [PATCH 17/17] nvme: use blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-26 13:03 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221030092208.GC5643@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=lengchao@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.