All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitrii Tcvetkov <me@demsh.org>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bisected] RAID1 direct IO redirecting sector loop since 6.0
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 23:51:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221101235144.06a3dbd3@xps.demsh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2FVzdcro8HCfODK@kbusch-mbp>

On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:22:21 -0600
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 12:15:58AM +0300, Dmitrii Tcvetkov wrote:
> > 
> > # cat /proc/7906/stack
> > [<0>] submit_bio_wait+0xdb/0x140
> > [<0>] blkdev_direct_IO+0x62f/0x770
> > [<0>] blkdev_read_iter+0xc1/0x140
> > [<0>] vfs_read+0x34e/0x3c0
> > [<0>] __x64_sys_pread64+0x74/0xc0
> > [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x6a/0x90
> > [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0xb5
> > 
> > After "mdadm --fail" invocation the last line becomes:
> > [pid  7906] pread64(13, 0x627c34c8d200, 4096, 0) = -1 EIO
> > (Input/output error)
> 
> It looks like something isn't accounting for the IO size correctly
> when there's an offset. It may be something specific to one of the
> stacking drivers in your block setup. Does this still happen without
> the cryptosetup step?
> 
I created setup lvm(mdraid(gpt(HDD))):

# lsblk -t -a
NAME                 ALIGNMENT MIN-IO OPT-IO PHY-SEC LOG-SEC ROTA SCHED RQ-SIZE  RA WSAME
...
sdd                          0    512      0     512     512    1 bfq        64 128    0B
├─sdd3                       0    512      0     512     512    1 bfq        64 128    0B
│ └─md1                      0    512      0     512     512    1           128 128    0B
│   ├─512lvmraid-zfs         0    512      0     512     512    1           128 128    0B
│   └─512lvmraid-wrk         0    512      0     512     512    1           128 128    0B
sde                          0    512      0     512     512    1 bfq        64 128    0B
├─sde3                       0    512      0     512     512    1 bfq        64 128    0B
│ └─md1                      0    512      0     512     512    1           128 128    0B
│   ├─512lvmraid-zfs         0    512      0     512     512    1           128 128    0B
│   └─512lvmraid-wrk         0    512      0     512     512    1           128 128    0B

where:
# mdadm --create --level=1 --metadata=1.2 \
	--raid-devices=2 /dev/md1 /dev/sdd3 /dev/sde3
# pvcreate /dev/md1
# vgcreate 512lvmraid /dev/md2

In this case problem doesn't reproduce, both guests start successfully.

It also doesn't reproduce with 4096 sector loop:
# lsblk -t -a                                                                           
NAME                 ALIGNMENT MIN-IO OPT-IO PHY-SEC LOG-SEC ROTA SCHED RQ-SIZE  RA WSAME
loop0                        0   4096      0    4096    4096    0 none      128 128    0B
└─md2                        0   4096      0    4096    4096    0           128 128    0B
  ├─4096lvmraid-zfs          0   4096      0    4096    4096    0           128 128    0B
  └─4096lvmraid-wrk          0   4096      0    4096    4096    0           128 128    0B
loop1                        0   4096      0    4096    4096    0 none      128 128    0B
└─md2                        0   4096      0    4096    4096    0           128 128    0B
  ├─4096lvmraid-zfs          0   4096      0    4096    4096    0           128 128    0B
  └─4096lvmraid-wrk          0   4096      0    4096    4096    0           128 128    0B

where:
# losetup --sector-size 4096 -f /dev/sdd4
# losetup --sector-size 4096 -f /dev/sde4
# mdadm --create --level=1 --metadata=1.2 \
	--raid-devices=2 /dev/md2 /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1
# pvcreate /dev/md2
# vgcreate 4096lvmraid /dev/md2

Indeed then something is wrong in LUKS.

> For a different experiment, it may be safer to just force all
> alignment for stacking drivers. Could you try the following and see
> if that gets it working again? 
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
> index 8bb9eef5310e..5c16fdb00c6f 100644
> --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> @@ -646,6 +646,7 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t,
> struct queue_limits *b, t->misaligned = 1;
>  		ret = -1;
>  	}
> +	blk_queue_dma_alignment(t, t->logical_block_size - 1);
>  
>  	t->max_sectors = blk_round_down_sectors(t->max_sectors,
> t->logical_block_size); t->max_hw_sectors =
> blk_round_down_sectors(t->max_hw_sectors, t->logical_block_size); --

This doesn't compile:
  CC      block/blk-settings.o                                                                 
block/blk-settings.c: In function ‘blk_stack_limits’:
block/blk-settings.c:649:33: error: passing argument 1 of ‘blk_queue_dma_alignment’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
  649 |         blk_queue_dma_alignment(t, t->logical_block_size - 1);
      |                                 ^
      |                                 |
      |                                 struct queue_limits *
In file included from block/blk-settings.c:9:
./include/linux/blkdev.h:956:37: note: expected ‘struct request_queue *’ but argument is of type ‘struct queue_limits *’
  956 | extern void blk_queue_dma_alignment(struct request_queue *, int);

I didn't find obvious way to get a request_queue pointer, which corresponds to struct queue_limits *t.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-01 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-31 21:15 [bisected] RAID1 direct IO redirecting sector loop since 6.0 Dmitrii Tcvetkov
2022-11-01  6:45 ` Paul Menzel
2022-11-01 17:22 ` Keith Busch
2022-11-01 20:51   ` Dmitrii Tcvetkov [this message]
2022-11-01 21:18     ` Keith Busch
2022-11-01 22:08       ` Dmitrii Tcvetkov
2022-11-02  4:57         ` Dmitrii Tcvetkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221101235144.06a3dbd3@xps.demsh.org \
    --to=me@demsh.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.