From: Dmitrii Tcvetkov <me@demsh.org>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bisected] RAID1 direct IO redirecting sector loop since 6.0
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 23:51:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221101235144.06a3dbd3@xps.demsh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2FVzdcro8HCfODK@kbusch-mbp>
On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:22:21 -0600
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 12:15:58AM +0300, Dmitrii Tcvetkov wrote:
> >
> > # cat /proc/7906/stack
> > [<0>] submit_bio_wait+0xdb/0x140
> > [<0>] blkdev_direct_IO+0x62f/0x770
> > [<0>] blkdev_read_iter+0xc1/0x140
> > [<0>] vfs_read+0x34e/0x3c0
> > [<0>] __x64_sys_pread64+0x74/0xc0
> > [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x6a/0x90
> > [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0xb5
> >
> > After "mdadm --fail" invocation the last line becomes:
> > [pid 7906] pread64(13, 0x627c34c8d200, 4096, 0) = -1 EIO
> > (Input/output error)
>
> It looks like something isn't accounting for the IO size correctly
> when there's an offset. It may be something specific to one of the
> stacking drivers in your block setup. Does this still happen without
> the cryptosetup step?
>
I created setup lvm(mdraid(gpt(HDD))):
# lsblk -t -a
NAME ALIGNMENT MIN-IO OPT-IO PHY-SEC LOG-SEC ROTA SCHED RQ-SIZE RA WSAME
...
sdd 0 512 0 512 512 1 bfq 64 128 0B
├─sdd3 0 512 0 512 512 1 bfq 64 128 0B
│ └─md1 0 512 0 512 512 1 128 128 0B
│ ├─512lvmraid-zfs 0 512 0 512 512 1 128 128 0B
│ └─512lvmraid-wrk 0 512 0 512 512 1 128 128 0B
sde 0 512 0 512 512 1 bfq 64 128 0B
├─sde3 0 512 0 512 512 1 bfq 64 128 0B
│ └─md1 0 512 0 512 512 1 128 128 0B
│ ├─512lvmraid-zfs 0 512 0 512 512 1 128 128 0B
│ └─512lvmraid-wrk 0 512 0 512 512 1 128 128 0B
where:
# mdadm --create --level=1 --metadata=1.2 \
--raid-devices=2 /dev/md1 /dev/sdd3 /dev/sde3
# pvcreate /dev/md1
# vgcreate 512lvmraid /dev/md2
In this case problem doesn't reproduce, both guests start successfully.
It also doesn't reproduce with 4096 sector loop:
# lsblk -t -a
NAME ALIGNMENT MIN-IO OPT-IO PHY-SEC LOG-SEC ROTA SCHED RQ-SIZE RA WSAME
loop0 0 4096 0 4096 4096 0 none 128 128 0B
└─md2 0 4096 0 4096 4096 0 128 128 0B
├─4096lvmraid-zfs 0 4096 0 4096 4096 0 128 128 0B
└─4096lvmraid-wrk 0 4096 0 4096 4096 0 128 128 0B
loop1 0 4096 0 4096 4096 0 none 128 128 0B
└─md2 0 4096 0 4096 4096 0 128 128 0B
├─4096lvmraid-zfs 0 4096 0 4096 4096 0 128 128 0B
└─4096lvmraid-wrk 0 4096 0 4096 4096 0 128 128 0B
where:
# losetup --sector-size 4096 -f /dev/sdd4
# losetup --sector-size 4096 -f /dev/sde4
# mdadm --create --level=1 --metadata=1.2 \
--raid-devices=2 /dev/md2 /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1
# pvcreate /dev/md2
# vgcreate 4096lvmraid /dev/md2
Indeed then something is wrong in LUKS.
> For a different experiment, it may be safer to just force all
> alignment for stacking drivers. Could you try the following and see
> if that gets it working again?
>
> ---
> diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
> index 8bb9eef5310e..5c16fdb00c6f 100644
> --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> @@ -646,6 +646,7 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t,
> struct queue_limits *b, t->misaligned = 1;
> ret = -1;
> }
> + blk_queue_dma_alignment(t, t->logical_block_size - 1);
>
> t->max_sectors = blk_round_down_sectors(t->max_sectors,
> t->logical_block_size); t->max_hw_sectors =
> blk_round_down_sectors(t->max_hw_sectors, t->logical_block_size); --
This doesn't compile:
CC block/blk-settings.o
block/blk-settings.c: In function ‘blk_stack_limits’:
block/blk-settings.c:649:33: error: passing argument 1 of ‘blk_queue_dma_alignment’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
649 | blk_queue_dma_alignment(t, t->logical_block_size - 1);
| ^
| |
| struct queue_limits *
In file included from block/blk-settings.c:9:
./include/linux/blkdev.h:956:37: note: expected ‘struct request_queue *’ but argument is of type ‘struct queue_limits *’
956 | extern void blk_queue_dma_alignment(struct request_queue *, int);
I didn't find obvious way to get a request_queue pointer, which corresponds to struct queue_limits *t.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-01 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-31 21:15 [bisected] RAID1 direct IO redirecting sector loop since 6.0 Dmitrii Tcvetkov
2022-11-01 6:45 ` Paul Menzel
2022-11-01 17:22 ` Keith Busch
2022-11-01 20:51 ` Dmitrii Tcvetkov [this message]
2022-11-01 21:18 ` Keith Busch
2022-11-01 22:08 ` Dmitrii Tcvetkov
2022-11-02 4:57 ` Dmitrii Tcvetkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221101235144.06a3dbd3@xps.demsh.org \
--to=me@demsh.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.