From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] string: Add __realloc_size hint to kmemdup()
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 12:40:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202211021240.4A97FDE0@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0289429-8779-643a-07da-3cda83c8ca9d@prevas.dk>
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 10:26:40AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 01/11/2022 23.33, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Add __realloc_size() hint to kmemdup() so the compiler can reason about
> > the length of the returned buffer. (These must not use __alloc_size,
> > since those include __malloc which says the contents aren't defined[1]).
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/d199c2af-06af-8a50-a6a1-00eefa0b67b4@prevas.dk/
> >
>
> > extern char *kstrndup(const char *s, size_t len, gfp_t gfp);
> > -extern void *kmemdup(const void *src, size_t len, gfp_t gfp) __alloc_size(2);
> > +extern void *kmemdup(const void *src, size_t len, gfp_t gfp) __realloc_size(2);
>
> What tree is this based on? I see that kmemdup() has grown that bogus
> __alloc_size in next-20221101, but in next-20221102 this commit seems to
> DTRT, namely
>
> -extern void *kmemdup(const void *src, size_t len, gfp_t gfp);
> +extern void *kmemdup(const void *src, size_t len, gfp_t gfp)
> __realloc_size(2);
>
> (i.e. there should never be an intermediate commit where kmemdup has
> __alloc_size()).
Right -- I fixed in in my -next tree to not use __alloc_size.
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-02 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-01 22:33 [PATCH 0/6] slab: Provide full coverage for __alloc_size attribute Kees Cook
2022-11-01 22:33 ` [PATCH 1/6] slab: Clean up SLOB vs kmalloc() definition Kees Cook
2022-11-03 13:32 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-01 22:33 ` [PATCH 2/6] slab: Remove special-casing of const 0 size allocations Kees Cook
2022-11-03 14:00 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-01 22:33 ` [PATCH 3/6] slab: Provide functional __alloc_size() hints to kmalloc_trace*() Kees Cook
2022-11-03 14:16 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-04 18:22 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-05 1:09 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-05 6:45 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-01 22:33 ` [PATCH 4/6] string: Add __realloc_size hint to kmemdup() Kees Cook
2022-11-02 9:26 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-11-02 19:40 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-11-01 22:33 ` [PATCH 5/6] driver core: Add __alloc_size hint to devm allocators Kees Cook
2023-02-01 7:36 ` Yongqin Liu
2023-02-01 8:11 ` John Stultz
2023-02-01 8:16 ` John Stultz
2023-02-01 18:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-02-02 17:18 ` Kees Cook
2023-02-02 18:56 ` John Stultz
2023-02-02 19:10 ` Kees Cook
2023-02-02 19:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-02-02 19:31 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-02-02 19:49 ` Sami Tolvanen
2023-02-02 19:53 ` Kees Cook
2023-02-02 20:11 ` Sami Tolvanen
2023-02-02 20:43 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-01 22:33 ` [PATCH 6/6] kunit/fortify: Validate __alloc_size attribute results Kees Cook
2022-11-02 18:15 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-29 12:24 ` [PATCH 0/6] slab: Provide full coverage for __alloc_size attribute Conor Dooley
2022-11-29 12:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-12-01 17:15 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202211021240.4A97FDE0@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.