From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
jiri@resnulli.us, razor@blackwall.org, nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com,
gnault@redhat.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com, fw@strlen.de,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 09/13] genetlink: add iterator for walking family ops
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 14:33:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221102213338.194672-10-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221102213338.194672-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Subsequent changes will expose split op structures to users,
so walking the family ops with just an index will get harder.
Add a structured iterator, convert the simple cases.
Policy dumping needs more careful conversion.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
net/netlink/genetlink.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netlink/genetlink.c b/net/netlink/genetlink.c
index ec32b6063a3f..06bf091c1b8a 100644
--- a/net/netlink/genetlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/genetlink.c
@@ -252,6 +252,57 @@ static void genl_get_cmd_by_index(unsigned int i,
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
}
+struct genl_op_iter {
+ const struct genl_family *family;
+ struct genl_split_ops doit;
+ struct genl_split_ops dumpit;
+ int i;
+ u32 cmd;
+ u8 flags;
+};
+
+static bool
+genl_op_iter_init(const struct genl_family *family, struct genl_op_iter *iter)
+{
+ iter->family = family;
+ iter->i = 0;
+
+ iter->flags = 0;
+
+ return genl_get_cmd_cnt(iter->family);
+}
+
+static bool genl_op_iter_next(struct genl_op_iter *iter)
+{
+ struct genl_ops op;
+
+ if (iter->i >= genl_get_cmd_cnt(iter->family))
+ return false;
+
+ genl_get_cmd_by_index(iter->i, iter->family, &op);
+ iter->i++;
+
+ genl_cmd_full_to_split(&iter->doit, iter->family, &op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DO);
+ genl_cmd_full_to_split(&iter->dumpit, iter->family,
+ &op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP);
+
+ iter->cmd = iter->doit.cmd | iter->dumpit.cmd;
+ iter->flags = iter->doit.flags | iter->dumpit.flags;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static void
+genl_op_iter_copy(struct genl_op_iter *dst, struct genl_op_iter *src)
+{
+ *dst = *src;
+}
+
+static unsigned int genl_op_iter_idx(struct genl_op_iter *iter)
+{
+ return iter->i;
+}
+
static int genl_allocate_reserve_groups(int n_groups, int *first_id)
{
unsigned long *new_groups;
@@ -419,25 +470,23 @@ static void genl_unregister_mc_groups(const struct genl_family *family)
static int genl_validate_ops(const struct genl_family *family)
{
- int i, j;
+ struct genl_op_iter i, j;
if (WARN_ON(family->n_ops && !family->ops) ||
WARN_ON(family->n_small_ops && !family->small_ops))
return -EINVAL;
- for (i = 0; i < genl_get_cmd_cnt(family); i++) {
- struct genl_ops op;
-
- genl_get_cmd_by_index(i, family, &op);
- if (op.dumpit == NULL && op.doit == NULL)
+ for (genl_op_iter_init(family, &i); genl_op_iter_next(&i); ) {
+ if (!(i.flags & (GENL_CMD_CAP_DO | GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP)))
return -EINVAL;
- if (WARN_ON(op.cmd >= family->resv_start_op && op.validate))
+
+ if (WARN_ON(i.cmd >= family->resv_start_op &&
+ (i.doit.validate || i.dumpit.validate)))
return -EINVAL;
- for (j = i + 1; j < genl_get_cmd_cnt(family); j++) {
- struct genl_ops op2;
- genl_get_cmd_by_index(j, family, &op2);
- if (op.cmd == op2.cmd)
+ genl_op_iter_copy(&j, &i);
+ while (genl_op_iter_next(&j)) {
+ if (i.cmd == j.cmd)
return -EINVAL;
}
}
@@ -917,6 +966,7 @@ static struct genl_family genl_ctrl;
static int ctrl_fill_info(const struct genl_family *family, u32 portid, u32 seq,
u32 flags, struct sk_buff *skb, u8 cmd)
{
+ struct genl_op_iter i;
void *hdr;
hdr = genlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, &genl_ctrl, flags, cmd);
@@ -930,33 +980,26 @@ static int ctrl_fill_info(const struct genl_family *family, u32 portid, u32 seq,
nla_put_u32(skb, CTRL_ATTR_MAXATTR, family->maxattr))
goto nla_put_failure;
- if (genl_get_cmd_cnt(family)) {
+ if (genl_op_iter_init(family, &i)) {
struct nlattr *nla_ops;
- int i;
nla_ops = nla_nest_start_noflag(skb, CTRL_ATTR_OPS);
if (nla_ops == NULL)
goto nla_put_failure;
- for (i = 0; i < genl_get_cmd_cnt(family); i++) {
+ while (genl_op_iter_next(&i)) {
struct nlattr *nest;
- struct genl_ops op;
u32 op_flags;
- genl_get_cmd_by_index(i, family, &op);
- op_flags = op.flags;
- if (op.dumpit)
- op_flags |= GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP;
- if (op.doit)
- op_flags |= GENL_CMD_CAP_DO;
- if (op.policy)
+ op_flags = i.flags;
+ if (i.doit.policy || i.dumpit.policy)
op_flags |= GENL_CMD_CAP_HASPOL;
- nest = nla_nest_start_noflag(skb, i + 1);
+ nest = nla_nest_start_noflag(skb, genl_op_iter_idx(&i));
if (nest == NULL)
goto nla_put_failure;
- if (nla_put_u32(skb, CTRL_ATTR_OP_ID, op.cmd) ||
+ if (nla_put_u32(skb, CTRL_ATTR_OP_ID, i.cmd) ||
nla_put_u32(skb, CTRL_ATTR_OP_FLAGS, op_flags))
goto nla_put_failure;
@@ -1229,8 +1272,8 @@ static int ctrl_dumppolicy_start(struct netlink_callback *cb)
struct ctrl_dump_policy_ctx *ctx = (void *)cb->ctx;
struct nlattr **tb = info->attrs;
const struct genl_family *rt;
- struct genl_ops op;
- int err, i;
+ struct genl_op_iter i;
+ int err;
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*ctx) > sizeof(cb->ctx));
@@ -1285,26 +1328,18 @@ static int ctrl_dumppolicy_start(struct netlink_callback *cb)
return 0;
}
- for (i = 0; i < genl_get_cmd_cnt(rt); i++) {
- struct genl_split_ops doit, dumpit;
-
- genl_get_cmd_by_index(i, rt, &op);
-
- genl_cmd_full_to_split(&doit, ctx->rt, &op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DO);
- genl_cmd_full_to_split(&dumpit, ctx->rt,
- &op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP);
-
- if (doit.policy) {
+ for (genl_op_iter_init(rt, &i); genl_op_iter_next(&i); ) {
+ if (i.doit.policy) {
err = netlink_policy_dump_add_policy(&ctx->state,
- doit.policy,
- doit.maxattr);
+ i.doit.policy,
+ i.doit.maxattr);
if (err)
goto err_free_state;
}
- if (dumpit.policy) {
+ if (i.dumpit.policy) {
err = netlink_policy_dump_add_policy(&ctx->state,
- dumpit.policy,
- dumpit.maxattr);
+ i.dumpit.policy,
+ i.dumpit.maxattr);
if (err)
goto err_free_state;
}
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-02 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-02 21:33 [PATCH net-next v2 00/13] genetlink: support per op type policies Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/13] genetlink: refactor the cmd <> policy mapping dump Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 23:52 ` Jacob Keller
2022-11-03 1:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-03 3:06 ` Keller, Jacob E
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/13] genetlink: move the private fields in struct genl_family Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/13] genetlink: introduce split op representation Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/13] genetlink: load policy based on validation flags Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/13] genetlink: check for callback type at op load time Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/13] genetlink: add policies for both doit and dumpit in ctrl_dumppolicy_start() Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-03 17:38 ` Jacob Keller
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/13] genetlink: support split policies in ctrl_dumppolicy_put_op() Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/13] genetlink: inline genl_get_cmd() Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-03 17:04 ` Jacob Keller
2022-11-02 21:33 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/13] genetlink: use iterator in the op to policy map dumping Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/13] genetlink: inline old iteration helpers Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 12/13] genetlink: allow families to use split ops directly Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-04 22:10 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2022-11-04 22:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-04 22:28 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 13/13] genetlink: convert control family to split ops Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-03 17:09 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/13] genetlink: support per op type policies Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221102213338.194672-10-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.