From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
hughd@google.com, vishal.moola@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] filemap-find_lock_entries-now-updates-start-offset.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2022 17:38:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221109013818.BD0F2C433D7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: filemap: find_lock_entries() now updates start offset
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
filemap-find_lock_entries-now-updates-start-offset.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
Subject: filemap: find_lock_entries() now updates start offset
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 09:17:59 -0700
Patch series "Rework find_get_entries() and find_lock_entries()", v3.
Originally the callers of find_get_entries() and find_lock_entries() were
keeping track of the start index themselves as they traverse the search
range.
This resulted in hacky code such as in shmem_undo_range():
index = folio->index + folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
where the - 1 is only present to stay in the right spot after incrementing
index later. This sort of calculation was also being done on every folio
despite not even using index later within that function.
These patches change find_get_entries() and find_lock_entries() to
calculate the new index instead of leaving it to the callers so we can
avoid all these complications.
This patch (of 2):
Initially, find_lock_entries() was being passed in the start offset as a
value. That left the calculation of the offset to the callers. This led
to complexity in the callers trying to keep track of the index.
Now find_lock_entries() takes in a pointer to the start offset and updates
the value to be directly after the last entry found. If no entry is
found, the offset is not changed. This gets rid of multiple hacky
calculations that kept track of the start offset.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221017161800.2003-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221017161800.2003-2-vishal.moola@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/filemap.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
mm/internal.h | 2 +-
mm/shmem.c | 8 ++------
mm/truncate.c | 11 +++--------
4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/filemap.c~filemap-find_lock_entries-now-updates-start-offset
+++ a/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2085,16 +2085,16 @@ unsigned find_get_entries(struct address
*
* Return: The number of entries which were found.
*/
-unsigned find_lock_entries(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t start,
+unsigned find_lock_entries(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t *start,
pgoff_t end, struct folio_batch *fbatch, pgoff_t *indices)
{
- XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, start);
+ XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, *start);
struct folio *folio;
rcu_read_lock();
while ((folio = find_get_entry(&xas, end, XA_PRESENT))) {
if (!xa_is_value(folio)) {
- if (folio->index < start)
+ if (folio->index < *start)
goto put;
if (folio->index + folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1 > end)
goto put;
@@ -2117,6 +2117,15 @@ put:
}
rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (folio_batch_count(fbatch)) {
+ unsigned long nr = 1;
+ int idx = folio_batch_count(fbatch) - 1;
+
+ folio = fbatch->folios[idx];
+ if (!xa_is_value(folio) && !folio_test_hugetlb(folio))
+ nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
+ *start = indices[idx] + nr;
+ }
return folio_batch_count(fbatch);
}
--- a/mm/internal.h~filemap-find_lock_entries-now-updates-start-offset
+++ a/mm/internal.h
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static inline void force_page_cache_read
force_page_cache_ra(&ractl, nr_to_read);
}
-unsigned find_lock_entries(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t start,
+unsigned find_lock_entries(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t *start,
pgoff_t end, struct folio_batch *fbatch, pgoff_t *indices);
unsigned find_get_entries(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t start,
pgoff_t end, struct folio_batch *fbatch, pgoff_t *indices);
--- a/mm/shmem.c~filemap-find_lock_entries-now-updates-start-offset
+++ a/mm/shmem.c
@@ -922,21 +922,18 @@ static void shmem_undo_range(struct inod
folio_batch_init(&fbatch);
index = start;
- while (index < end && find_lock_entries(mapping, index, end - 1,
+ while (index < end && find_lock_entries(mapping, &index, end - 1,
&fbatch, indices)) {
for (i = 0; i < folio_batch_count(&fbatch); i++) {
folio = fbatch.folios[i];
- index = indices[i];
-
if (xa_is_value(folio)) {
if (unfalloc)
continue;
nr_swaps_freed += !shmem_free_swap(mapping,
- index, folio);
+ indices[i], folio);
continue;
}
- index += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
if (!unfalloc || !folio_test_uptodate(folio))
truncate_inode_folio(mapping, folio);
@@ -945,7 +942,6 @@ static void shmem_undo_range(struct inod
folio_batch_remove_exceptionals(&fbatch);
folio_batch_release(&fbatch);
cond_resched();
- index++;
}
same_folio = (lstart >> PAGE_SHIFT) == (lend >> PAGE_SHIFT);
--- a/mm/truncate.c~filemap-find_lock_entries-now-updates-start-offset
+++ a/mm/truncate.c
@@ -361,9 +361,8 @@ void truncate_inode_pages_range(struct a
folio_batch_init(&fbatch);
index = start;
- while (index < end && find_lock_entries(mapping, index, end - 1,
+ while (index < end && find_lock_entries(mapping, &index, end - 1,
&fbatch, indices)) {
- index = indices[folio_batch_count(&fbatch) - 1] + 1;
truncate_folio_batch_exceptionals(mapping, &fbatch, indices);
for (i = 0; i < folio_batch_count(&fbatch); i++)
truncate_cleanup_folio(fbatch.folios[i]);
@@ -510,20 +509,17 @@ unsigned long invalidate_mapping_pagevec
int i;
folio_batch_init(&fbatch);
- while (find_lock_entries(mapping, index, end, &fbatch, indices)) {
+ while (find_lock_entries(mapping, &index, end, &fbatch, indices)) {
for (i = 0; i < folio_batch_count(&fbatch); i++) {
struct folio *folio = fbatch.folios[i];
/* We rely upon deletion not changing folio->index */
- index = indices[i];
if (xa_is_value(folio)) {
count += invalidate_exceptional_entry(mapping,
- index,
- folio);
+ indices[i], folio);
continue;
}
- index += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
ret = mapping_evict_folio(mapping, folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
@@ -542,7 +538,6 @@ unsigned long invalidate_mapping_pagevec
folio_batch_remove_exceptionals(&fbatch);
folio_batch_release(&fbatch);
cond_resched();
- index++;
}
return count;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from vishal.moola@gmail.com are
reply other threads:[~2022-11-09 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221109013818.BD0F2C433D7@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.