From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com,
yhs@fb.com, alan.maguire@oracle.com, acme@kernel.org,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] selftests/bpf: Tests for btf_dedup_resolve_fwds
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 16:26:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221109142611.879983-4-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221109142611.879983-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
Tests to verify the following behavior of `btf_dedup_resolve_fwds`:
- remapping for struct forward declarations;
- remapping for union forward declarations;
- no remapping if forward declaration kind does not match similarly
named struct or union declaration;
- no remapping if forward declaration name is ambiguous;
- base ids are considered for fwd resolution in split btf scenario.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 176 ++++++++++++++++++
.../bpf/prog_tests/btf_dedup_split.c | 45 +++--
2 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
index c3e1cea9abae..95a2b80f0d17 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
@@ -7690,6 +7690,182 @@ static struct btf_dedup_test dedup_tests[] = {
BTF_STR_SEC("\0e1\0e1_val\0td"),
},
},
+{
+ .descr = "dedup: standalone fwd declaration struct",
+ /*
+ * Verify that CU1:foo and CU2:foo would be unified and that
+ * typedef/ptr would be updated to point to CU1:foo.
+ *
+ * // CU 1:
+ * struct foo { int x; };
+ *
+ * // CU 2:
+ * struct foo;
+ * typedef struct foo *foo_ptr;
+ */
+ .input = {
+ .raw_types = {
+ /* CU 1 */
+ BTF_STRUCT_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 1, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
+ /* CU 2 */
+ BTF_FWD_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 0), /* [3] */
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(3), /* [4] */
+ BTF_TYPEDEF_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 4), /* [5] */
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0foo\0x\0foo_ptr"),
+ },
+ .expect = {
+ .raw_types = {
+ BTF_STRUCT_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 1, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(1), /* [3] */
+ BTF_TYPEDEF_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 3), /* [4] */
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0foo\0x\0foo_ptr"),
+ },
+},
+{
+ .descr = "dedup: standalone fwd declaration union",
+ /*
+ * Verify that CU1:foo and CU2:foo would be unified and that
+ * typedef/ptr would be updated to point to CU1:foo.
+ * Same as "dedup: standalone fwd declaration struct" but for unions.
+ *
+ * // CU 1:
+ * union foo { int x; };
+ *
+ * // CU 2:
+ * union foo;
+ * typedef union foo *foo_ptr;
+ */
+ .input = {
+ .raw_types = {
+ /* CU 1 */
+ BTF_UNION_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 1, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
+ /* CU 2 */
+ BTF_FWD_ENC(NAME_TBD, 1), /* [3] */
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(3), /* [4] */
+ BTF_TYPEDEF_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 4), /* [5] */
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0foo\0x\0foo_ptr"),
+ },
+ .expect = {
+ .raw_types = {
+ BTF_UNION_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 1, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(1), /* [3] */
+ BTF_TYPEDEF_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 3), /* [4] */
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0foo\0x\0foo_ptr"),
+ },
+},
+{
+ .descr = "dedup: standalone fwd declaration wrong kind",
+ /*
+ * Negative test for btf_dedup_resolve_fwds:
+ * - CU1:foo is a struct, C2:foo is a union, thus CU2:foo is not deduped;
+ * - typedef/ptr should remain unchanged as well.
+ *
+ * // CU 1:
+ * struct foo { int x; };
+ *
+ * // CU 2:
+ * union foo;
+ * typedef union foo *foo_ptr;
+ */
+ .input = {
+ .raw_types = {
+ /* CU 1 */
+ BTF_STRUCT_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 1, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
+ /* CU 2 */
+ BTF_FWD_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 1), /* [3] */
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(3), /* [4] */
+ BTF_TYPEDEF_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 4), /* [5] */
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0foo\0x\0foo_ptr"),
+ },
+ .expect = {
+ .raw_types = {
+ /* CU 1 */
+ BTF_STRUCT_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 1, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
+ /* CU 2 */
+ BTF_FWD_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 1), /* [3] */
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(3), /* [4] */
+ BTF_TYPEDEF_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 4), /* [5] */
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0foo\0x\0foo_ptr"),
+ },
+},
+{
+ .descr = "dedup: standalone fwd declaration name conflict",
+ /*
+ * Negative test for btf_dedup_resolve_fwds:
+ * - two candidates for CU2:foo dedup, thus it is unchanged;
+ * - typedef/ptr should remain unchanged as well.
+ *
+ * // CU 1:
+ * struct foo { int x; };
+ *
+ * // CU 2:
+ * struct foo;
+ * typedef struct foo *foo_ptr;
+ *
+ * // CU 3:
+ * struct foo { int x; int y; };
+ */
+ .input = {
+ .raw_types = {
+ /* CU 1 */
+ BTF_STRUCT_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 1, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
+ /* CU 2 */
+ BTF_FWD_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 0), /* [3] */
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(3), /* [4] */
+ BTF_TYPEDEF_ENC(NAME_NTH(4), 4), /* [5] */
+ /* CU 3 */
+ BTF_STRUCT_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 2, 8), /* [6] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 2, 0),
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0foo\0x\0y\0foo_ptr"),
+ },
+ .expect = {
+ .raw_types = {
+ /* CU 1 */
+ BTF_STRUCT_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 1, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
+ /* CU 2 */
+ BTF_FWD_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 0), /* [3] */
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(3), /* [4] */
+ BTF_TYPEDEF_ENC(NAME_NTH(4), 4), /* [5] */
+ /* CU 3 */
+ BTF_STRUCT_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 2, 8), /* [6] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 2, 0),
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0foo\0x\0y\0foo_ptr"),
+ },
+},
};
static int btf_type_size(const struct btf_type *t)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dedup_split.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dedup_split.c
index 90aac437576d..d9024c7a892a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dedup_split.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dedup_split.c
@@ -141,6 +141,10 @@ static void test_split_fwd_resolve() {
btf__add_field(btf1, "f2", 3, 64, 0); /* struct s2 *f2; */
/* } */
btf__add_struct(btf1, "s2", 4); /* [5] struct s2 { */
+ btf__add_field(btf1, "f1", 1, 0, 0); /* int f1; */
+ /* } */
+ /* keep this not a part of type the graph to test btf_dedup_resolve_fwds */
+ btf__add_struct(btf1, "s3", 4); /* [6] struct s3 { */
btf__add_field(btf1, "f1", 1, 0, 0); /* int f1; */
/* } */
@@ -153,20 +157,24 @@ static void test_split_fwd_resolve() {
"\t'f1' type_id=2 bits_offset=0\n"
"\t'f2' type_id=3 bits_offset=64",
"[5] STRUCT 's2' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+ "\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+ "[6] STRUCT 's3' size=4 vlen=1\n"
"\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0");
btf2 = btf__new_empty_split(btf1);
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf2, "empty_split_btf"))
goto cleanup;
- btf__add_int(btf2, "int", 4, BTF_INT_SIGNED); /* [6] int */
- btf__add_ptr(btf2, 10); /* [7] ptr to struct s1 */
- btf__add_fwd(btf2, "s2", BTF_FWD_STRUCT); /* [8] fwd for struct s2 */
- btf__add_ptr(btf2, 8); /* [9] ptr to fwd struct s2 */
- btf__add_struct(btf2, "s1", 16); /* [10] struct s1 { */
- btf__add_field(btf2, "f1", 7, 0, 0); /* struct s1 *f1; */
- btf__add_field(btf2, "f2", 9, 64, 0); /* struct s2 *f2; */
+ btf__add_int(btf2, "int", 4, BTF_INT_SIGNED); /* [7] int */
+ btf__add_ptr(btf2, 11); /* [8] ptr to struct s1 */
+ btf__add_fwd(btf2, "s2", BTF_FWD_STRUCT); /* [9] fwd for struct s2 */
+ btf__add_ptr(btf2, 9); /* [10] ptr to fwd struct s2 */
+ btf__add_struct(btf2, "s1", 16); /* [11] struct s1 { */
+ btf__add_field(btf2, "f1", 8, 0, 0); /* struct s1 *f1; */
+ btf__add_field(btf2, "f2", 10, 64, 0); /* struct s2 *f2; */
/* } */
+ btf__add_fwd(btf2, "s3", BTF_FWD_STRUCT); /* [12] fwd for struct s3 */
+ btf__add_ptr(btf2, 12); /* [13] ptr to struct s1 */
VALIDATE_RAW_BTF(
btf2,
@@ -178,13 +186,17 @@ static void test_split_fwd_resolve() {
"\t'f2' type_id=3 bits_offset=64",
"[5] STRUCT 's2' size=4 vlen=1\n"
"\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
- "[6] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED",
- "[7] PTR '(anon)' type_id=10",
- "[8] FWD 's2' fwd_kind=struct",
- "[9] PTR '(anon)' type_id=8",
- "[10] STRUCT 's1' size=16 vlen=2\n"
- "\t'f1' type_id=7 bits_offset=0\n"
- "\t'f2' type_id=9 bits_offset=64");
+ "[6] STRUCT 's3' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+ "\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+ "[7] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED",
+ "[8] PTR '(anon)' type_id=11",
+ "[9] FWD 's2' fwd_kind=struct",
+ "[10] PTR '(anon)' type_id=9",
+ "[11] STRUCT 's1' size=16 vlen=2\n"
+ "\t'f1' type_id=8 bits_offset=0\n"
+ "\t'f2' type_id=10 bits_offset=64",
+ "[12] FWD 's3' fwd_kind=struct",
+ "[13] PTR '(anon)' type_id=12");
err = btf__dedup(btf2, NULL);
if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf_dedup"))
@@ -199,7 +211,10 @@ static void test_split_fwd_resolve() {
"\t'f1' type_id=2 bits_offset=0\n"
"\t'f2' type_id=3 bits_offset=64",
"[5] STRUCT 's2' size=4 vlen=1\n"
- "\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0");
+ "\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+ "[6] STRUCT 's3' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+ "\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+ "[7] PTR '(anon)' type_id=6");
cleanup:
btf__free(btf2);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-09 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-09 14:26 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] libbpf: Resolve unambigous forward declarations Eduard Zingerman
2022-11-09 14:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] libbpf: hashmap interface update to allow both long and void* keys/values Eduard Zingerman
2022-11-10 4:54 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-10 12:28 ` Eduard Zingerman
2022-11-11 18:20 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-09 14:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/3] libbpf: Resolve unambigous forward declarations Eduard Zingerman
2022-11-09 14:26 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2022-11-10 5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221109142611.879983-4-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.