From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, vschneid@redhat.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au, sander@svanheule.net, peterz@infradead.org,
paulmck@kernel.org, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
klimov.linux@gmail.com, geert@linux-m68k.org,
ebiggers@google.com, dvyukov@google.com,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, yury.norov@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-nonmm-stable] cpumask-limit-visibility-of-force_nr_cpus.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:32:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221115223220.D75F7C433C1@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: cpumask: limit visibility of FORCE_NR_CPUS
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
cpumask-limit-visibility-of-force_nr_cpus.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-nonmm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Subject: cpumask: limit visibility of FORCE_NR_CPUS
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:59:39 -0700
In current form, FORCE_NR_CPUS is visible to all users building their
kernels, even not experts. It is also set in allmodconfig or
allyesconfig, which is not a correct behavior.
The 'choice' and unused config UNFORCE_NR_CPUS are used to ensure that
auto-generated configs that try to enable as much options as possible,
like allmodconfig, don't enable FORCE_NR_CPUS.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221019225939.1646349-1-yury.norov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
lib/Kconfig | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/lib/Kconfig~cpumask-limit-visibility-of-force_nr_cpus
+++ a/lib/Kconfig
@@ -528,14 +528,31 @@ config CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
them on the stack. This is a bit more expensive, but avoids
stack overflow.
+choice
+ prompt "Number of CPUs detection method"
+ default UNFORCE_NR_CPUS
+ depends on SMP && EXPERT
+ help
+ Select between boot-time and compile-time detection of number
+ of CPUs. If it's possible to provide exact number of CPUs at
+ compile-time, kernel code may be optimized better.
+ For general-purpose kernel, choose "boot time" option.
+
+config UNFORCE_NR_CPUS
+ bool "Set number of CPUs at boot time"
+ help
+ Choose it if you build general-purpose kernel and want to rely
+ on kernel to detect actual number of CPUs.
+
config FORCE_NR_CPUS
- bool "NR_CPUS is set to an actual number of CPUs"
- depends on SMP
- help
- Say Yes if you have NR_CPUS set to an actual number of possible
- CPUs in your system, not to a default value. This forces the core
- code to rely on compile-time value and optimize kernel routines
- better.
+ bool "Set number of CPUs at compile time"
+ help
+ Choose it if NR_CPUS corresponds to an actual number of
+ possible CPUs in your system. This forces the core code
+ to rely on compile-time value and optimize kernel routines
+ better.
+
+endchoice
config CPU_RMAP
bool
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from yury.norov@gmail.com are
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-15 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-15 22:32 Andrew Morton [this message]
2022-11-15 23:13 ` [merged mm-nonmm-stable] cpumask-limit-visibility-of-force_nr_cpus.patch removed from -mm tree Yury Norov
2022-11-15 23:23 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-12-01 0:14 Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221115223220.D75F7C433C1@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=klimov.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sander@svanheule.net \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.