From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: ira.weiny@intel.com
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/doe: Fix work struct declaration
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 11:09:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221116100939.GA32050@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221115011943.1051039-1-ira.weiny@intel.com>
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 05:19:43PM -0800, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
>
> The callers of pci_doe_submit_task() allocate the pci_doe_task on the
> stack. This causes the work structure to be allocated on the stack
> without pci_doe_submit_task() knowing. Work item initialization needs
> to be done with either INIT_WORK_ONSTACK() or INIT_WORK() depending on
> how the work item is allocated.
>
> Jonathan suggested creating doe task allocation macros such as
> DECLARE_CDAT_DOE_TASK_ONSTACK().[1] The issue with this is the work
> function is not known to the callers and must be initialized correctly.
>
> A follow up suggestion was to have an internal 'pci_doe_work' item
> allocated by pci_doe_submit_task().[2] This requires an allocation which
> could restrict the context where tasks are used.
>
> Compromise with an intermediate step to initialize the task struct with
> a new call pci_doe_init_task() which must be called prior to submit
> task.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20221014151045.24781-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com/T/#m88a7f50dcce52f30c8bf5c3dcc06fa9843b54a2d
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20221014151045.24781-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com/T/#m63c636c5135f304480370924f4d03c00357be667
We have object_is_on_stack(), included from <linux/sched/task_stack.h>.
So you could just autosense in pci_doe_submit_task() whether
pci_doe_task is on the stack and call the appropriate INIT_WORK
variant.
Any reason not to do that?
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-16 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-15 1:19 [PATCH] PCI/doe: Fix work struct declaration ira.weiny
2022-11-15 11:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-11-15 19:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-15 20:18 ` Ira Weiny
2022-11-15 20:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-15 20:54 ` Ira Weiny
2022-11-15 22:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-16 10:09 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2022-11-16 18:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-16 20:57 ` Ira Weiny
2022-11-16 21:10 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221116100939.GA32050@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregory.price@memverge.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.