From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15525C4332F for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67EAA1ED; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:37:16 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 67EAA1ED DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1669019886; bh=nj5hYa2Uv7ARsPhjSCtxUDoLfjFw7tengbqAhE0k/Cw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=IGdrJu/1z8o6uhpCJD3k37IbxPZX5D2Yy8hycYSHjBgkTbQBR5yTINGavE15hRTXL AxA9zvowr1pZ//uGckIrxoQYF8BbrXnmhloXyuj0BWj9TbeTHIQFZHHXcMkdecXLT4 x/iU1rK6dBh+DwyIH2iVd9Khm+qsKJw3bGiiqvKo= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F55AF80149; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:37:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 85DB3F8028D; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:37:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF3ECF80115 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:37:09 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz DF3ECF80115 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id CDDBA68AA6; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:37:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:37:07 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] ALSA: memalloc: don't pass bogus GFP_ flags to dma_alloc_* Message-ID: <20221121083707.GA27649@lst.de> References: <20221113163535.884299-1-hch@lst.de> <20221113163535.884299-7-hch@lst.de> <87leod52l6.wl-tiwai@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87leod52l6.wl-tiwai@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Alexandra Winter , Dennis Dalessandro , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai , Wenjia Zhang , iommu@lists.linux.dev, Russell King , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Robin Murphy , Christoph Hellwig , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marek Szyprowski X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:04:37AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > It mentions something about sparc32/64. I hope this isn't relevant > any longer (honestly I have no idea about that). It shouldn't. sparc is using fairly generic code now. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 370D6A2C for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id CDDBA68AA6; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:37:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:37:07 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Dennis Dalessandro , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Alexandra Winter , Wenjia Zhang , Marek Szyprowski , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Russell King , Robin Murphy , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] ALSA: memalloc: don't pass bogus GFP_ flags to dma_alloc_* Message-ID: <20221121083707.GA27649@lst.de> References: <20221113163535.884299-1-hch@lst.de> <20221113163535.884299-7-hch@lst.de> <87leod52l6.wl-tiwai@suse.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: iommu@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87leod52l6.wl-tiwai@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:04:37AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > It mentions something about sparc32/64. I hope this isn't relevant > any longer (honestly I have no idea about that). It shouldn't. sparc is using fairly generic code now. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55CEFC433FE for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:38:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=AEFQI0vJC3LHZYYg+DbSStatFXSjeP6I3sPs8weTJl0=; b=M/sm7TDuUExt/B LbkkeYKGBv4er837G0ajAlW0jzaWoIk2xSjoN+se/7l9wkgjAZFx+yZLl3p3e5I/pnN4ljIi4Ean7 ZPBU4gduU7VfNXRg/RDNh1AbwxQKfBnBDzPoWA/LgBIABC+eYPkvfA/o/58E36sWgKoLuGFrnzJqN 7koqVnEKFRS1qwAxeFNgn4euxvNUuqG8nL7jvWjPpkWv2t//OflXn8Z3atvRHC234HUtuOZSG+cVO helzLX4OGfLg9W/oWtHCY0Kh15vaD62CMqGNCWWsQ2T3ROmHpNWd8b/ZioK688b+osTLgtau0Rdvg yUSMtSeTHRSAEgA/c5Lw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ox2Iq-00BL4w-10; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:37:20 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ox2Ii-00BL2C-2s for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:37:13 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id CDDBA68AA6; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:37:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:37:07 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Dennis Dalessandro , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Alexandra Winter , Wenjia Zhang , Marek Szyprowski , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Russell King , Robin Murphy , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] ALSA: memalloc: don't pass bogus GFP_ flags to dma_alloc_* Message-ID: <20221121083707.GA27649@lst.de> References: <20221113163535.884299-1-hch@lst.de> <20221113163535.884299-7-hch@lst.de> <87leod52l6.wl-tiwai@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87leod52l6.wl-tiwai@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221121_003712_337146_18D95747 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.16 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:04:37AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > It mentions something about sparc32/64. I hope this isn't relevant > any longer (honestly I have no idea about that). It shouldn't. sparc is using fairly generic code now. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel