Re: [PATCH] prune: quiet ENOENT on missing directories

[Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>]

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> writes:
> 
> > $GIT_DIR/objects/pack may be removed to save inodes in shared
> > repositories.  Quiet down prune in cases where either
> > $GIT_DIR/objects or $GIT_DIR/objects/pack is non-existent,
> 
> Wouldn't setup.c::is_git_directory() say "nope, you do not have a
> repository there" if you are missing $GIT_DIR/objects?  So I suspect
> that the only case this matters in practice is a missing pack/
> subdirectory.

Right.  Removing $GIT_DIR/objects isn't currently OK, but maybe
someday it could be...  Supporting missing pack/ is the primary
reason for this change, but making a small step towards allowing
objects/-free $GIT_DIR doesn't seem harmful.

> I agree that silently ignoring missing objects/pack/ is perfectly
> fine, whether we auto-vivify it when we actually create a pack.
> 
> > but emit the system error in other cases to help users diagnose
> > permissions problems or resource constraints.
> 
> OK.
> 
> > @@ -127,7 +127,9 @@ static void remove_temporary_files(const char *path)
> >  
> >  	dir = opendir(path);
> >  	if (!dir) {
> > -		fprintf(stderr, "Unable to open directory %s\n", path);
> > +		if (errno != ENOENT)
> > +			fprintf(stderr, "Unable to open directory %s: %s\n",
> > +				path, strerror(errno));
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> 
> This is called twice, with $GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY and its pack
> subdirectory, as it does not recurse.  

Right.

> This is a tangent, I have to wonder how effective the first call
> would be, though.  When writing a loose object file, we compute its
> object name first in-core and determine the final filename, create a
> temporary file in the same directory as the final file, write into
> it and then finally rename the temporary to the final name.  The
> fan-out $GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY/??/ directories may have temporary
> files left when such a process crashed, but do we create cruft "git
> prune" should remove in $GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY/ itself?

Good question, perhaps this could be a followup:

diff --git a/builtin/prune.c b/builtin/prune.c
index 2719220108..041c45ecbe 100644
--- a/builtin/prune.c
+++ b/builtin/prune.c
@@ -188,7 +188,6 @@ int cmd_prune(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 				      prune_cruft, prune_subdir, &revs);
 
 	prune_packed_objects(show_only ? PRUNE_PACKED_DRY_RUN : 0);
-	remove_temporary_files(get_object_directory());
 	s = mkpathdup("%s/pack", get_object_directory());
 	remove_temporary_files(s);
 	free(s);

OTOH, perhaps there's some 3rd-party tools (e.g. backup tools)
that leave stuff in top-level objects/ and we'd risk breaking
a rare setup via ENOSPC.