From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: Ashok Raj <ashok_raj@linux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
Yuzhang Luo <yuzhang.luo@intel.com>,
jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Add a fix for devices need extra dtlb flush
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 08:13:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221128081331.5da37699@jacob-builder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3z+SojRxCGancX1@araj-dh-work>
Hi Ashok,
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:52:26 +0000, Ashok Raj <ashok_raj@linux.intel.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 07:45:29PM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > QAT devices on Intel Sapphire Rapids and Emerald Rapids has a defect in
> >
>
> s/has/have
will do
> > address translation service (ATS). These devices may inadvertently issue
> > ATS invalidation completion before posted writes initiated with
> > translated address that utilized translations matching the invalidation
> > address range, violating the invalidation completion ordering.
>
> Above is a bit hard to read, can you see if the rephrasing works?
>
> These devices send the invalidation response ahead of servicing any posted
> writes that could be using the same address range. This can lead to memory
> corruption.
>
It is a little long but these are taken from the errata draft. I think it is
better to keep the wording consistent?
> >
> > An additional device TLB invalidation is needed to ensure no more posted
> > writes with translated address following the invalidation completion.
> >
> > Without this fix, DMA writes with translated address can happen after
> > device TLB invalidation is completed. Random data corruption can occur
> > as the DMA buffer gets reused after invalidation.
>
> Maybe drop both para above and replace with.
>
> An additional dTLB invalidation ensures the ordering is preserved and
> prevents any data-corruption.
I can add this but I am not seeing any gains here.
> >
> > This patch adds a flag to mark the need for an extra flush based on
> > given device IDs, this flag is set during initialization when ATS
> > support is enabled.
> >
> > At runtime, this flag is used to control the extra dTLB flush. The
> > overhead of checking this unlikely true flag is smaller than checking
> > PCI device IDs every time.
>
> The above 2 para's can be dropped? Since that's what the code does and
> probably not needed in the commit log.
sounds good.
> >
> > Device TLBs are invalidated under the following six conditions:
> > 1. Device driver does DMA API unmap IOVA
> > 2. Device driver unbind a PASID from a process, sva_unbind_device()
> > 3. PASID is torn down, after PASID cache is flushed. e.g. process
> > exit_mmap() due to crash
> > 4. Under SVA usage, called by mmu_notifier.invalidate_range() where
> > VM has to free pages that were unmapped
> > 5. userspace driver unmaps a DMA buffer
> > 6. Cache invalidation in vSVA usage (upcoming)
> >
> > For #1 and #2, device drivers are responsible for stopping DMA traffic
> > before unmap/unbind. For #3, iommu driver gets mmu_notifier to
> > invalidate TLB the same way as normal user unmap which will do an extra
> > invalidation. The dTLB invalidation after PASID cache flush does not
> > need an extra invalidation.
> >
> > Therefore, we only need to deal with #4 and #5 in this patch. #1 is also
> > covered by this patch due to common code path with #5.
>
> I was told to add an imperative statement to tell what the patch does,
> without the code.
>
> Maybe something like:
>
> Add an extra device TLB invalidation for affected devices.
>
Sounds good,I will merge this with the statement above.
> >
> > Tested-by: Yuzhang Luo <yuzhang.luo@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
>
> > drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 3 ++
> > drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 4 +-
> > 3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > index 996a8b5ee5ee..6254788330b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > @@ -1396,6 +1396,39 @@ static void domain_update_iotlb(struct
> > dmar_domain *domain) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags);
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Check that the device does not live on an external facing PCI port
> > that is
> > + * marked as untrusted. Such devices should not be able to apply
> > quirks and
> > + * thus not be able to bypass the IOMMU restrictions.
> > + */
> > +static bool risky_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > + if (pdev->untrusted) {
> > + pci_info(pdev,
> > + "Skipping IOMMU quirk for dev [%04X:%04X] on
> > untrusted PCI link\n",
> > + pdev->vendor, pdev->device);
> > + pci_info(pdev, "Please check with your BIOS/Platform
> > vendor about this\n");
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Impacted QAT device IDs ranging from 0x4940 to 0x4943 */
> > +#define BUGGY_QAT_DEVID_MASK 0x494c
> > +static bool dev_needs_extra_dtlb_flush(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > + if (pdev->vendor != PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + if ((pdev->device & 0xfffc) != BUGGY_QAT_DEVID_MASK)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + if (risky_device(pdev))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void iommu_enable_pci_caps(struct device_domain_info *info)
> > {
> > struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > @@ -1478,6 +1511,7 @@ static void __iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(struct
> > device_domain_info *info, qdep = info->ats_qdep;
> > qi_flush_dev_iotlb(info->iommu, sid, info->pfsid,
> > qdep, addr, mask);
> > + quirk_dev_tlb(info, addr, mask, PASID_RID2PASID, qdep);
> > }
> >
> > static void iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> > @@ -4490,9 +4524,10 @@ static struct iommu_device
> > *intel_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev) if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
> > if (ecap_dev_iotlb_support(iommu->ecap) &&
> > pci_ats_supported(pdev) &&
> > - dmar_ats_supported(pdev, iommu))
> > + dmar_ats_supported(pdev, iommu)) {
> > info->ats_supported = 1;
> > -
> > + info->dtlb_extra_inval =
> > dev_needs_extra_dtlb_flush(pdev);
> > + }
> > if (sm_supported(iommu)) {
> > if (pasid_supported(iommu)) {
> > int features =
> > pci_pasid_features(pdev); @@ -4680,23 +4715,6 @@ static bool
> > intel_iommu_is_attach_deferred(struct device *dev) return
> > translation_pre_enabled(info->iommu) && !info->domain; }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * Check that the device does not live on an external facing PCI port
> > that is
> > - * marked as untrusted. Such devices should not be able to apply
> > quirks and
> > - * thus not be able to bypass the IOMMU restrictions.
> > - */
> > -static bool risky_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > -{
> > - if (pdev->untrusted) {
> > - pci_info(pdev,
> > - "Skipping IOMMU quirk for dev [%04X:%04X] on
> > untrusted PCI link\n",
> > - pdev->vendor, pdev->device);
> > - pci_info(pdev, "Please check with your BIOS/Platform
> > vendor about this\n");
> > - return true;
> > - }
> > - return false;
> > -}
> > -
> > static void intel_iommu_iotlb_sync_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > unsigned long iova, size_t size)
> > {
> > @@ -4931,3 +4949,47 @@ static void __init check_tylersburg_isoch(void)
> > pr_warn("Recommended TLB entries for ISOCH unit is 16; your
> > BIOS set %d\n", vtisochctrl);
> > }
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Here we deal with a device TLB defect where device may
> > inadvertently issue ATS
> > + * invalidation completion before posted writes initiated with
> > translated address
> > + * that utilized translations matching the invalidation address range,
> > violating
> > + * the invalidation completion ordering.
> > + * Therefore, any use cases that cannot guarantee DMA is stopped
> > before unmap is
> > + * vulnerable to this defect. In other words, any dTLB invalidation
> > initiated not
> > + * under the control of the trusted/privileged host device driver must
> > use this
> > + * quirk.
> > + * Device TLBs are invalidated under the following six conditions:
> > + * 1. Device driver does DMA API unmap IOVA
> > + * 2. Device driver unbind a PASID from a process, sva_unbind_device()
> > + * 3. PASID is torn down, after PASID cache is flushed. e.g. process
> > + * exit_mmap() due to crash
> > + * 4. Under SVA usage, called by mmu_notifier.invalidate_range() where
> > + * VM has to free pages that were unmapped
> > + * 5. Userspace driver unmaps a DMA buffer
> > + * 6. Cache invalidation in vSVA usage (upcoming)
> > + *
> > + * For #1 and #2, device drivers are responsible for stopping DMA
> > traffic
> > + * before unmap/unbind. For #3, iommu driver gets mmu_notifier to
> > + * invalidate TLB the same way as normal user unmap which will use
> > this quirk.
> > + * The dTLB invalidation after PASID cache flush does not need this
> > quirk.
> > + *
> > + * As a reminder, #6 will *NEED* this quirk as we enable nested
> > translation.
> > + */
> > +void quirk_dev_tlb(struct device_domain_info *info, unsigned long
> > address,
> > + unsigned long mask, u32 pasid, u16 qdep)
> > +{
> > + u16 sid;
> > +
> > + if (likely(!info->dtlb_extra_inval))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + sid = PCI_DEVID(info->bus, info->devfn);
> > + if (pasid == PASID_RID2PASID) {
> > + qi_flush_dev_iotlb(info->iommu, sid, info->pfsid,
> > + qdep, address, mask);
> > + } else {
> > + qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(info->iommu, sid, info->pfsid,
> > + pasid, qdep, address, mask);
> > + }
> > +}
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> > index 92023dff9513..09b989bf545f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
> > @@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ struct device_domain_info {
> > u8 pri_enabled:1;
> > u8 ats_supported:1;
> > u8 ats_enabled:1;
> > + u8 dtlb_extra_inval:1; /* Quirk for devices need extra
> > flush */ u8 ats_qdep;
> > struct device *dev; /* it's NULL for PCIe-to-PCI bridge */
> > struct intel_iommu *iommu; /* IOMMU used by this device */
> > @@ -728,6 +729,8 @@ void qi_flush_piotlb(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16
> > did, u32 pasid, u64 addr, void qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(struct
> > intel_iommu *iommu, u16 sid, u16 pfsid, u32 pasid, u16 qdep, u64 addr,
> > unsigned int size_order);
> > +void quirk_dev_tlb(struct device_domain_info *info, unsigned long
> > address,
> > + unsigned long pages, u32 pasid, u16 qdep);
> > void qi_flush_pasid_cache(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, u64
> > granu, u32 pasid);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
> > index 7d08eb034f2d..117430b97ba9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
> > @@ -184,10 +184,12 @@ static void __flush_svm_range_dev(struct
> > intel_svm *svm, return;
> >
> > qi_flush_piotlb(sdev->iommu, sdev->did, svm->pasid, address,
> > pages, ih);
> > - if (info->ats_enabled)
> > + if (info->ats_enabled) {
> > qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(sdev->iommu, sdev->sid,
> > info->pfsid, svm->pasid, sdev->qdep, address,
> > order_base_2(pages));
> > + quirk_dev_tlb(info, address, order_base_2(pages),
> > svm->pasid, sdev->qdep);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > static void intel_flush_svm_range_dev(struct intel_svm *svm,
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
> >
Thanks,
Jacob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-28 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-22 3:45 [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Add a fix for devices need extra dtlb flush Jacob Pan
2022-11-22 16:52 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-28 16:13 ` Jacob Pan [this message]
2022-11-22 17:49 ` Robin Murphy
2022-11-23 1:02 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-23 5:03 ` Baolu Lu
2022-11-23 5:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-23 11:32 ` Robin Murphy
2022-11-24 2:52 ` Baolu Lu
2022-11-28 16:02 ` Jacob Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221128081331.5da37699@jacob-builder \
--to=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=ashok_raj@linux.intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yuzhang.luo@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.