All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David T-G <davidtg-robot@justpickone.org>
To: Linux RAID list <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: stripe size checking (was "Re: about linear and about RAID10")
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 05:52:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221203055220.GS19721@jpo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAMCDee_YrhXo+5hp31YXgUHkyuUr-zTXOqi0-HUjMrHpYMkTQ@mail.gmail.com>

Roger, et al --

...and then Roger Heflin said...
% How big is your stripe size set to?   The bigger the stripe size on the
% md40 main raid the closer it gets to linear.

I don't know ... and I don't know how to tell.

  davidtg@jpo:~> sudo mdadm -D /dev/md40
  /dev/md40:
	     Version : 1.2
       Creation Time : Mon Aug  8 12:15:12 2022
	  Raid Level : raid0
	  Array Size : 3906488320 (3.64 TiB 4.00 TB)
	Raid Devices : 2
       Total Devices : 2
	 Persistence : Superblock is persistent
  
	 Update Time : Mon Aug  8 12:15:12 2022
	       State : clean 
      Active Devices : 2
     Working Devices : 2
      Failed Devices : 0
       Spare Devices : 0
  
	      Layout : -unknown-
	  Chunk Size : 512K
  
  Consistency Policy : none
  
		Name : jpo:40  (local to host jpo)
		UUID : 4735f53c:7cdf7758:e212bec6:aa2942e8
	      Events : 0
  
      Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
	 0       9       41        0      active sync   /dev/md/md41
	 1       9       42        1      active sync   /dev/md/md42
  
  davidtg@jpo:~> sudo mdadm -E /dev/md40
  /dev/md40:
     MBR Magic : aa55
  Partition[0] :   4294967295 sectors at            1 (type ee)

Is it the 512k chunk size?

% 
% And I think I did miss one behavior that explains it being faster with
% larger, and not sucking as bad as I expected.  On disks the internal cache
% is supposed to cache the entire track as it goes under the head, so when

Sounds familiar.


% you ask for the data theoriticaly requiring a seek the drive may already
% have the data still in its cache and hence not need to do a seek.   The
% performance would then be ok so long as the data is still in the cache.

Right.  Everything is awesome when the data is cached :-)


% But given your tests md40 at best gets close to the underlying raids
% performance.  When linear the underlying performance should be roughly
% equal.

Now that I understand linear, that makes sense.


Thanks again & HANN

:-D
-- 
David T-G
See http://justpickone.org/davidtg/email/
See http://justpickone.org/davidtg/tofu.txt


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-03  5:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-23 22:07 how do i fix these RAID5 arrays? David T-G
2022-11-23 22:28 ` Roman Mamedov
2022-11-24  0:01   ` Roger Heflin
2022-11-24 21:20     ` David T-G
2022-11-24 21:49       ` Wol
2022-11-25 13:36         ` and dm-integrity, too (was "Re: how do i fix these RAID5 arrays?") David T-G
2022-11-24 21:10   ` how do i fix these RAID5 arrays? David T-G
2022-11-24 21:33     ` Wol
2022-11-25  1:16       ` Roger Heflin
2022-11-25 13:22         ` David T-G
     [not found]           ` <CAAMCDed1-4zFgHMS760dO1pThtkrn8K+FMuG-QQ+9W-FE0iq9Q@mail.gmail.com>
2022-11-25 19:49             ` David T-G
2022-11-28 14:24               ` md RAID0 can be grown (was "Re: how do i fix these RAID5 arrays?") David T-G
2022-11-29 21:17                 ` Jani Partanen
2022-11-29 22:22                   ` Roman Mamedov
2022-12-03  5:41                   ` md vs LVM and VMs and ... (was "Re: md RAID0 can be grown (was ...") David T-G
2022-12-03 12:06                     ` Wols Lists
2022-12-03 18:04                       ` batches and serial numbers (was "Re: md vs LVM and VMs and ...") David T-G
2022-12-03 20:07                         ` Wols Lists
2022-12-04  2:47                           ` batches and serial numbers David T-G
2022-12-04 13:54                             ` Wols Lists
2022-12-04 13:04                         ` batches and serial numbers (was "Re: md vs LVM and VMs and ...") Reindl Harald
2022-12-03  5:41                 ` md RAID0 can be grown David T-G
2022-11-25 13:30       ` about linear and about RAID10 (was "Re: how do i fix these RAID5 arrays?") David T-G
2022-11-25 14:23         ` Wols Lists
2022-11-25 19:50           ` about linear and about RAID10 David T-G
2022-11-25 18:00         ` about linear and about RAID10 (was "Re: how do i fix these RAID5 arrays?") Roger Heflin
2022-11-28 14:46           ` about linear and about RAID10 David T-G
2022-11-28 15:32             ` Reindl Harald
     [not found]               ` <CAAMCDecXkcmUe=ZFnJ_NndND0C2=D5qSoj1Hohsrty8y1uqdfw@mail.gmail.com>
2022-11-28 17:03                 ` Reindl Harald
2022-11-28 20:45               ` John Stoffel
2022-12-03  5:58                 ` David T-G
2022-12-03 12:16                   ` Wols Lists
2022-12-03 18:27                     ` David T-G
2022-12-03 23:26                       ` Wol
2022-12-04  2:53                         ` David T-G
2022-12-04 13:13                           ` Reindl Harald
2022-12-04 13:08                       ` Reindl Harald
2022-12-03  5:45               ` David T-G
2022-12-03 12:20                 ` Reindl Harald
     [not found]             ` <CAAMCDee_YrhXo+5hp31YXgUHkyuUr-zTXOqi0-HUjMrHpYMkTQ@mail.gmail.com>
2022-12-03  5:52               ` David T-G [this message]
2022-11-25 14:49     ` how do i fix these RAID5 arrays? Wols Lists
2022-11-26 20:02       ` John Stoffel
2022-11-27  9:33         ` Wols Lists
2022-11-27 11:46         ` Reindl Harald
2022-11-27 11:52           ` Wols Lists
2022-11-27 12:06             ` Reindl Harald
2022-11-27 14:33               ` Wol
2022-11-27 18:08                 ` Roman Mamedov
2022-11-27 19:21                   ` Wol
2022-11-28  1:26                     ` Reindl Harald
2022-11-27 18:23                 ` Reindl Harald
2022-11-27 19:30                   ` Wol
2022-11-27 19:51                     ` Reindl Harald
2022-11-27 14:10           ` piergiorgio.sartor
2022-11-27 18:21             ` Reindl Harald
2022-11-27 19:37               ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2022-11-27 19:52                 ` Reindl Harald
2022-11-27 22:05               ` Wol
2022-11-27 22:08                 ` Reindl Harald
2022-11-27 22:11                 ` Reindl Harald
2022-11-27 22:17                 ` Roman Mamedov
2022-11-27 14:58           ` John Stoffel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221203055220.GS19721@jpo \
    --to=davidtg-robot@justpickone.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.