From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, michael.chan@broadcom.com,
ioana.ciornei@nxp.com, dmichail@fungible.com,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
tchornyi@marvell.com, tariqt@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com,
leon@kernel.org, idosch@nvidia.com, petrm@nvidia.com,
vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, claudiu.manoil@nxp.com,
alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, simon.horman@corigine.com,
shannon.nelson@amd.com, brett.creeley@amd.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 0/8] devlink: make sure devlink port registers/unregisters only for registered instance
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 17:08:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221205170826.17c78e90@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221205152257.454610-1-jiri@resnulli.us>
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 16:22:49 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Currently, the devlink_register() is called as the last thing during
> driver init phase. For devlink objects, this is fine as the
> notifications of objects creations are withheld to be send only after
> devlink instance is registered. Until devlink is registered it is not
> visible to userspace.
>
> But if a netdev is registered before, user gets a notification with
> a link to devlink, which is not visible to the user yet.
> This is the event order user sees:
> * new netdev event over RT netlink
> * new devlink event over devlink netlink
> * new devlink_port event over devlink netlink
>
> Also, this is not consistent with devlink port split or devlink reload
> flows, where user gets notifications in following order:
> * new devlink event over devlink netlink
> and then during port split or reload operation:
> * new devlink_port event over devlink netlink
> * new netdev event over RT netlink
>
> In this case, devlink port and related netdev are registered on already
> registered devlink instance.
>
> Purpose of this patchset is to fix the drivers init flow so devlink port
> gets registered only after devlink instance is registered.
I didn't reply because I don't have much to add beyond what
I've already said too many times. I prefer to move to my
initial full refcounting / full locking design. I haven't posted
any patches because I figured it's too low priority and too risky
to be doing right before the merge window.
I agree that reordering is a good idea but not as a fix, and hopefully
without conditional locking in the drivers:
+ if (!reload)
+ devl_lock(devlink);
+ err = mlxsw_driver->ports_init(mlxsw_core);
+ if (!reload)
+ devl_unlock(devlink);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-06 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-05 15:22 [patch net-next 0/8] devlink: make sure devlink port registers/unregisters only for registered instance Jiri Pirko
2022-12-05 15:22 ` [patch net-next 1/8] devlink: call devlink_port_register/unregister() on " Jiri Pirko
2022-12-05 23:55 ` Shannon Nelson
2022-12-06 7:41 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-06 7:56 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-06 17:35 ` Shannon Nelson
2022-12-07 13:27 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-07 19:45 ` Shannon Nelson
2022-12-05 15:22 ` [patch net-next 2/8] netdevsim: call devl_port_register/unregister() " Jiri Pirko
2022-12-05 15:22 ` [patch net-next 3/8] mlxsw: " Jiri Pirko
2022-12-05 15:22 ` [patch net-next 4/8] nfp: " Jiri Pirko
2022-12-05 15:22 ` [patch net-next 5/8] mlx4: " Jiri Pirko
2022-12-05 15:22 ` [patch net-next 6/8] mlx5: " Jiri Pirko
2022-12-05 15:22 ` [patch net-next 7/8] devlink: assert if devl_port_register/unregister() is called on unregistered devlink instance Jiri Pirko
2022-12-05 15:22 ` [patch net-next 8/8] devlink: remove port notifications from devlink_register/unregister() Jiri Pirko
2022-12-06 1:08 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-12-06 7:44 ` [patch net-next 0/8] devlink: make sure devlink port registers/unregisters only for registered instance Jiri Pirko
2022-12-06 20:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-07 13:28 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221205170826.17c78e90@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=brett.creeley@amd.com \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dmichail@fungible.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shannon.nelson@amd.com \
--cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=tchornyi@marvell.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.