From: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>, Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>,
Midas Chien <midaschieh@google.com>,
"Connor O'Brien" <connoro@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH] pstore: Switch pmsg_lock to an rt_mutex to avoid priority inversion
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 20:32:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221205203253.3923812-1-jstultz@google.com> (raw)
Wei Wang reported seeing priority inversion caused latencies
caused by contention on pmsg_lock, and suggested it be switched
to a rt_mutex.
I was initially hesitant this would help, as the tasks in that
trace all seemed to be SCHED_NORMAL, so the benefit would be
limited to only nice boosting.
However, another similar issue was raised where the priority
inversion was seen did involve a blocked RT task so it is clear
this would be helpful in that case.
Feedback would be appreciate!
Cc: Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>
Cc: Midas Chien<midaschieh@google.com>
Cc: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Reported-by: Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
---
fs/pstore/pmsg.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/pstore/pmsg.c b/fs/pstore/pmsg.c
index d8542ec2f38c..18cf94b597e0 100644
--- a/fs/pstore/pmsg.c
+++ b/fs/pstore/pmsg.c
@@ -7,9 +7,10 @@
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/rtmutex.h>
#include "internal.h"
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(pmsg_lock);
+static DEFINE_RT_MUTEX(pmsg_lock);
static ssize_t write_pmsg(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
@@ -28,9 +29,9 @@ static ssize_t write_pmsg(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
if (!access_ok(buf, count))
return -EFAULT;
- mutex_lock(&pmsg_lock);
+ rt_mutex_lock(&pmsg_lock);
ret = psinfo->write_user(&record, buf);
- mutex_unlock(&pmsg_lock);
+ rt_mutex_unlock(&pmsg_lock);
return ret ? ret : count;
}
--
2.39.0.rc0.267.gcb52ba06e7-goog
next reply other threads:[~2022-12-05 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-05 20:32 John Stultz [this message]
2022-12-14 22:53 ` [RFC PATCH] pstore: Switch pmsg_lock to an rt_mutex to avoid priority inversion Kees Cook
2022-12-14 23:08 ` John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221205203253.3923812-1-jstultz@google.com \
--to=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=anton@enomsg.org \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=connoro@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=midaschieh@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wvw@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.