From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
mkubecek@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/2] ethtool/uapi: use BIT for bit-shifts
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 18:41:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221207184105.74dfdd1c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221207231728.2331166-2-jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 15:17:27 -0800 Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> #define ETH_RSS_HASH_TOP __ETH_RSS_HASH(TOP)
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
> index 58e587ba0450..6ce5da444098 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> * christopher.leech@intel.com,
> * scott.feldman@intel.com)
> * Portions Copyright (C) Sun Microsystems 2008
> + * Portions Copyright (C) 2022 Intel Corporation
Is that appropriate?
> +/* BIT() and BIT_ULL() are defined in include/linux/bits.h but we need a
> + * local version to clean up this file and not break simultaneous
> + * kernel/userspace where userspace doesn't have the BIT and BIT_ULL
> + * defined. To avoid compiler issues we use the exact same definitions here
> + * of the macros as defined in the file noted below, so that we don't get
> + * 'duplicate define' or 'redefinition' errors.
> + */
> +/* include/uapi/linux/const.h */
> +#define __AC(X,Y) (X##Y)
> +#define _AC(X,Y) __AC(X,Y)
> +#define _AT(T,X) ((T)(X))
> +#define _UL(x) (_AC(x, UL))
> +#define _ULL(x) (_AC(x, ULL))
> +/* include/vdso/linux/const.h */
> +#define UL(x) (_UL(x))
> +#define ULL(x) (_ULL(x))
> +/* include/vdso/bits.h */
> +#define BIT(nr) (UL(1) << (nr))
> +/* include/linux/bits.h */
> +#define BIT_ULL(nr) (ULL(1) << (nr))
include/uapi/linux/const.h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-08 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-07 23:17 [PATCH net-next v1 0/2] ethtool: use bits.h defines Jesse Brandeburg
2022-12-07 23:17 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/2] ethtool/uapi: use BIT for bit-shifts Jesse Brandeburg
2022-12-08 2:41 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-12-09 22:17 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2022-12-07 23:17 ` [PATCH net-next v1 2/2] ethtool: refactor bit-shifts Jesse Brandeburg
2022-12-08 2:40 ` [PATCH net-next v1 0/2] ethtool: use bits.h defines Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-09 22:18 ` Jesse Brandeburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221207184105.74dfdd1c@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.