Re: [meta-ti] [master][PATCH v2] meta-ti-bsp: Graphics recipe overhaul

[Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>]

Hmm, some of the context of the original commenting is lost here. Any way to 
get the comments inline with the original patch preserved for reference?


On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 04:18:22PM -0600, Randolph Sapp via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7 2022 at 12:48:00 PM -0600, Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
> wrote:
> >Since the UM driver now RDEPENDS on the KM, could we also drop this
> >last line everywhere?
> 
> Nope, we still need the one preferred provider line to indicate that
> rogue graphics are present. Now this could be replaced by a
> rogue-graphics machine feature instead if that's preferable, but
> something will need to signal the mesa switch.
> 
> On Wed, Dec 7 2022 at 12:48:00 PM -0600, Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
> wrote:
> >Bash? Are we sure we need that?
> 
> Yes. The System V init script still needs it. Now could we look at
> removing that init script? Sure, so long as the device probe still
> works. What is actually taking care of that right now? It's not udev
> is it?
> 
> On Wed, Dec 7 2022 at 12:48:00 PM -0600, Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
> wrote:
> >"ldflags already-stripped" should be the only skips we still need.
> 
> Dev-so is required because of some of the symbolic links that are
> shipped. I'm fine dropping arch unless that breaks something.