Re: Should -overcommit cpu-pm=on|off be converted to some machine sugar property?

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 05:11:11PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
> 
> I just noticed 'enable_cpu_pm' which seems architecture specific
> option that ended into common code:
> 
> $ git grep -E 'cpu[_-]pm'
> accel/tcg/user-exec-stub.c:5:bool enable_cpu_pm = false;
> include/sysemu/sysemu.h:49:extern bool enable_cpu_pm;
> Binary file pc-bios/skiboot.lid matches
> qemu-options.hx:4196:    "-overcommit [mem-lock=on|off][cpu-pm=on|off]\n"
> qemu-options.hx:4199:    "                cpu-pm=on|off controls cpu power
> management (default: off)\n",
> qemu-options.hx:4204:``-overcommit cpu-pm=on|off``
> qemu-options.hx:4214:    guest) can be enabled via ``cpu-pm=on`` (disabled
> by default). This
> softmmu/globals.c:38:bool enable_cpu_pm;
> softmmu/vl.c:350:            .name = "cpu-pm",
> softmmu/vl.c:3440:                enable_cpu_pm = qemu_opt_get_bool(opts,
> "cpu-pm", false);
> target/i386/host-cpu.c:44:static void host_cpu_enable_cpu_pm(X86CPU *cpu)
> target/i386/host-cpu.c:88:    if (cpu->max_features && enable_cpu_pm) {
> target/i386/host-cpu.c:89:        host_cpu_enable_cpu_pm(cpu);
> target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c:43:        if (enable_cpu_pm && kvm_has_waitpkg())
> {
> target/i386/kvm/kvm.c:390:        if (enable_cpu_pm) {
> target/i386/kvm/kvm.c:2576:    if (enable_cpu_pm) {
> 
> Do we want to maintain this as a generic property or
> can it be deprecated / converted to a machine-specific one?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Phil.

I don't care much.
ATM it only works well if you have a dedicated host CPU and memory, this
is why we put it in -overcommit.

-- 
MST