Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Decouple INTx-to-LNKx routing from south bridges

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 11:26:42PM +0000, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 20. Dezember 2022 23:10:45 UTC schrieb "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>:
> >On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 10:21:49AM +0000, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Am 9. Dezember 2022 15:23:59 UTC schrieb "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>:
> >> >On 20/11/22 16:05, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
> >> >> v1:
> >> >> ===
> >> >> 
> >> >> During my PIIX consolidation work [1] I've noticed that both PIIX models have
> >> >> quite different pci_slot_get_pirq() implementations. These functions seem to
> >> >> map PCI INTx pins to input pins of a programmable interrupt router which is
> >> >> AFAIU board-specific. IOW, board-specific assumptions are baked into the device
> >> >> models which prevent e.g. the whole PIIX4 south bridge to be reusable in the PC
> >> >> machine.
> >> >> 
> >> >> This series first factors out pci_bus_map_irqs() from pci_bus_irqs() which
> >> >> then allowes for moving the two board-specific PIIX pci_slot_get_pirq()
> >> >> funtions into their respective boards. With these changes, the PIIX4 south
> >> >> bridge could eventually become an alternative to the PIIX3-Frankenstein
> >> >> solution in the PC machine.
> >> >
> >> >Series:
> >> >Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> >> 
> >> Ping
> >> 
> >> Who will pull this?
> >
> >To clarify, you want this dropped for now?
> 
> Yeah, let's merge via mips-next since this series is related to the PIIX consolidation series (see above) and mips-next is planned to be pulled soon.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bernhard


For that

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>