All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/hugetlb: fix uffd-wp handling for migration entries in hugetlb_change_protection()
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 21:55:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221222205511.675832-3-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221222205511.675832-1-david@redhat.com>

We have to update the uffd-wp SWP PTE bit independent of the type of
migration entry. Currently, if we're unlucky and we want to install/clear
the uffd-wp bit just while we're migrating a read-only mapped hugetlb page,
we would miss to set/clear the uffd-wp bit.

Further, if we're processing a readable-exclusive
migration entry and neither want to set or clear the uffd-wp bit, we
could currently end up losing the uffd-wp bit. Note that the same would
hold for writable migrating entries, however, having a writable
migration entry with the uffd-wp bit set would already mean that
something went wrong.

Note that the change from !is_readable_migration_entry ->
writable_migration_entry is harmless and actually cleaner, as raised by
Miaohe Lin and discussed in [1].

[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/90dd6a93-4500-e0de-2bf0-bf522c311b0c@huawei.com

Fixes: 60dfaad65aa9 ("mm/hugetlb: allow uffd wr-protect none ptes")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 3a94f519304f..9552a6d1a281 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -6516,10 +6516,9 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		} else if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_migration(pte))) {
 			swp_entry_t entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
 			struct page *page = pfn_swap_entry_to_page(entry);
+			pte_t newpte = pte;
 
-			if (!is_readable_migration_entry(entry)) {
-				pte_t newpte;
-
+			if (is_writable_migration_entry(entry)) {
 				if (PageAnon(page))
 					entry = make_readable_exclusive_migration_entry(
 								swp_offset(entry));
@@ -6527,13 +6526,15 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 					entry = make_readable_migration_entry(
 								swp_offset(entry));
 				newpte = swp_entry_to_pte(entry);
-				if (uffd_wp)
-					newpte = pte_swp_mkuffd_wp(newpte);
-				else if (uffd_wp_resolve)
-					newpte = pte_swp_clear_uffd_wp(newpte);
-				set_huge_pte_at(mm, address, ptep, newpte);
 				pages++;
 			}
+
+			if (uffd_wp)
+				newpte = pte_swp_mkuffd_wp(newpte);
+			else if (uffd_wp_resolve)
+				newpte = pte_swp_clear_uffd_wp(newpte);
+			if (!pte_same(pte, newpte))
+				set_huge_pte_at(mm, address, ptep, newpte);
 		} else if (unlikely(is_pte_marker(pte))) {
 			/* No other markers apply for now. */
 			WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_marker_uffd_wp(pte));
-- 
2.38.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-22 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-22 20:55 [PATCH v1 0/2] mm/hugetlb: uffd-wp fixes for hugetlb_change_protection() David Hildenbrand
2022-12-22 20:55 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/hugetlb: fix PTE marker handling in hugetlb_change_protection() David Hildenbrand
2022-12-22 22:57   ` Mike Kravetz
2022-12-22 20:55 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2022-12-22 23:20   ` [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/hugetlb: fix uffd-wp handling for migration entries " Mike Kravetz
2022-12-22 21:17 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] mm/hugetlb: uffd-wp fixes for hugetlb_change_protection() Peter Xu
2022-12-22 21:28   ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221222205511.675832-3-david@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.