From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, surenb@google.com, rppt@kernel.org,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, Michael@MichaelLarabel.com,
mhocko@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, corbet@lwn.net,
yuzhao@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-multi-gen-lru-shuffle-should_run_aging.patch added to mm-unstable branch
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 13:43:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221222214343.349D3C433EF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: mm: multi-gen LRU: shuffle should_run_aging()
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
mm-multi-gen-lru-shuffle-should_run_aging.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-multi-gen-lru-shuffle-should_run_aging.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Subject: mm: multi-gen LRU: shuffle should_run_aging()
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 21:19:03 -0700
Move should_run_aging() next to its only caller left.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222041905.2431096-6-yuzhao@google.com
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Michael Larabel <Michael@MichaelLarabel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-multi-gen-lru-shuffle-should_run_aging
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -4467,68 +4467,6 @@ done:
return true;
}
-static bool should_run_aging(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long max_seq,
- struct scan_control *sc, bool can_swap, unsigned long *nr_to_scan)
-{
- int gen, type, zone;
- unsigned long old = 0;
- unsigned long young = 0;
- unsigned long total = 0;
- struct lru_gen_folio *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
- struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
- DEFINE_MIN_SEQ(lruvec);
-
- /* whether this lruvec is completely out of cold folios */
- if (min_seq[!can_swap] + MIN_NR_GENS > max_seq) {
- *nr_to_scan = 0;
- return true;
- }
-
- for (type = !can_swap; type < ANON_AND_FILE; type++) {
- unsigned long seq;
-
- for (seq = min_seq[type]; seq <= max_seq; seq++) {
- unsigned long size = 0;
-
- gen = lru_gen_from_seq(seq);
-
- for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++)
- size += max(READ_ONCE(lrugen->nr_pages[gen][type][zone]), 0L);
-
- total += size;
- if (seq == max_seq)
- young += size;
- else if (seq + MIN_NR_GENS == max_seq)
- old += size;
- }
- }
-
- /* try to scrape all its memory if this memcg was deleted */
- *nr_to_scan = mem_cgroup_online(memcg) ? (total >> sc->priority) : total;
-
- /*
- * The aging tries to be lazy to reduce the overhead, while the eviction
- * stalls when the number of generations reaches MIN_NR_GENS. Hence, the
- * ideal number of generations is MIN_NR_GENS+1.
- */
- if (min_seq[!can_swap] + MIN_NR_GENS < max_seq)
- return false;
-
- /*
- * It's also ideal to spread pages out evenly, i.e., 1/(MIN_NR_GENS+1)
- * of the total number of pages for each generation. A reasonable range
- * for this average portion is [1/MIN_NR_GENS, 1/(MIN_NR_GENS+2)]. The
- * aging cares about the upper bound of hot pages, while the eviction
- * cares about the lower bound of cold pages.
- */
- if (young * MIN_NR_GENS > total)
- return true;
- if (old * (MIN_NR_GENS + 2) < total)
- return true;
-
- return false;
-}
-
static bool lruvec_is_sizable(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
{
int gen, type, zone;
@@ -5112,6 +5050,68 @@ retry:
return scanned;
}
+static bool should_run_aging(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long max_seq,
+ struct scan_control *sc, bool can_swap, unsigned long *nr_to_scan)
+{
+ int gen, type, zone;
+ unsigned long old = 0;
+ unsigned long young = 0;
+ unsigned long total = 0;
+ struct lru_gen_folio *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
+ DEFINE_MIN_SEQ(lruvec);
+
+ /* whether this lruvec is completely out of cold folios */
+ if (min_seq[!can_swap] + MIN_NR_GENS > max_seq) {
+ *nr_to_scan = 0;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ for (type = !can_swap; type < ANON_AND_FILE; type++) {
+ unsigned long seq;
+
+ for (seq = min_seq[type]; seq <= max_seq; seq++) {
+ unsigned long size = 0;
+
+ gen = lru_gen_from_seq(seq);
+
+ for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++)
+ size += max(READ_ONCE(lrugen->nr_pages[gen][type][zone]), 0L);
+
+ total += size;
+ if (seq == max_seq)
+ young += size;
+ else if (seq + MIN_NR_GENS == max_seq)
+ old += size;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* try to scrape all its memory if this memcg was deleted */
+ *nr_to_scan = mem_cgroup_online(memcg) ? (total >> sc->priority) : total;
+
+ /*
+ * The aging tries to be lazy to reduce the overhead, while the eviction
+ * stalls when the number of generations reaches MIN_NR_GENS. Hence, the
+ * ideal number of generations is MIN_NR_GENS+1.
+ */
+ if (min_seq[!can_swap] + MIN_NR_GENS < max_seq)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * It's also ideal to spread pages out evenly, i.e., 1/(MIN_NR_GENS+1)
+ * of the total number of pages for each generation. A reasonable range
+ * for this average portion is [1/MIN_NR_GENS, 1/(MIN_NR_GENS+2)]. The
+ * aging cares about the upper bound of hot pages, while the eviction
+ * cares about the lower bound of cold pages.
+ */
+ if (young * MIN_NR_GENS > total)
+ return true;
+ if (old * (MIN_NR_GENS + 2) < total)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/*
* For future optimizations:
* 1. Defer try_to_inc_max_seq() to workqueues to reduce latency for memcg
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from yuzhao@google.com are
mm-multi-gen-lru-rename-lru_gen_struct-to-lru_gen_folio.patch
mm-multi-gen-lru-rename-lrugen-lists-to-lrugen-folios.patch
mm-multi-gen-lru-remove-eviction-fairness-safeguard.patch
mm-multi-gen-lru-remove-aging-fairness-safeguard.patch
mm-multi-gen-lru-shuffle-should_run_aging.patch
mm-multi-gen-lru-per-node-lru_gen_folio-lists.patch
mm-multi-gen-lru-clarify-scan_control-flags.patch
mm-multi-gen-lru-simplify-arch_has_hw_pte_young-check.patch
reply other threads:[~2022-12-22 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221222214343.349D3C433EF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Michael@MichaelLarabel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.