All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, josef@toxicpanda.com, hch@lst.de
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] blkcg: Drop unnecessary RCU read [un]locks from blkg_conf_prep/finish()
Date: Wed,  4 Jan 2023 14:20:04 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230105002007.157497-2-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230105002007.157497-1-tj@kernel.org>

Holding the queue lock now implies RCU read lock, so no need to use
rcu_read_[un]lock() explicitly. This shouldn't cause any behavior changes.

While at it, drop __acquires() annotation on the queue lock too. The
__acquires() part was already out of sync and it doesn't catch anything that
lockdep can't.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 block/blk-cgroup.c | 11 ++---------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
index ce6a2b7d3dfb..99674e23cf88 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
@@ -672,12 +672,11 @@ struct block_device *blkcg_conf_open_bdev(char **inputp)
  *
  * Parse per-blkg config update from @input and initialize @ctx with the
  * result.  @ctx->blkg points to the blkg to be updated and @ctx->body the
- * part of @input following MAJ:MIN.  This function returns with RCU read
- * lock and queue lock held and must be paired with blkg_conf_finish().
+ * part of @input following MAJ:MIN.  This function returns with queue lock
+ * held and must be paired with blkg_conf_finish().
  */
 int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
 		   char *input, struct blkg_conf_ctx *ctx)
-	__acquires(rcu) __acquires(&bdev->bd_queue->queue_lock)
 {
 	struct block_device *bdev;
 	struct gendisk *disk;
@@ -699,7 +698,6 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
 	if (ret)
 		goto fail;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
 
 	if (!blkcg_policy_enabled(q, pol)) {
@@ -728,7 +726,6 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
 
 		/* Drop locks to do new blkg allocation with GFP_KERNEL. */
 		spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
-		rcu_read_unlock();
 
 		new_blkg = blkg_alloc(pos, disk, GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (unlikely(!new_blkg)) {
@@ -742,7 +739,6 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
 			goto fail_exit_queue;
 		}
 
-		rcu_read_lock();
 		spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
 
 		if (!blkcg_policy_enabled(q, pol)) {
@@ -778,7 +774,6 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
 	radix_tree_preload_end();
 fail_unlock:
 	spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 fail_exit_queue:
 	blk_queue_exit(q);
 fail:
@@ -805,10 +800,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_conf_prep);
  * with blkg_conf_prep().
  */
 void blkg_conf_finish(struct blkg_conf_ctx *ctx)
-	__releases(&ctx->bdev->bd_queue->queue_lock) __releases(rcu)
 {
 	spin_unlock_irq(&bdev_get_queue(ctx->bdev)->queue_lock);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	blkdev_put_no_open(ctx->bdev);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_conf_finish);
-- 
2.39.0


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-05  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-05  0:20 [PATCHSET block/for-next] blkcg: Improve blkg config helpers and make iolatency init lazy Tejun Heo
2023-01-05  0:20 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2023-01-05  0:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] blkcg: Restructure blkg_conf_prep() and friends Tejun Heo
2023-01-05  0:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] blk-iolatency: s/blkcg_rq_qos/iolat_rq_qos/ Tejun Heo
2023-01-05  0:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-iolatency: Make initialization lazy Tejun Heo
2023-01-05 18:56 ` [PATCHSET block/for-next] blkcg: Improve blkg config helpers and make iolatency init lazy Tejun Heo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-05 21:24 [PATCHSET v2 " Tejun Heo
2023-01-05 21:24 ` [PATCH 1/4] blkcg: Drop unnecessary RCU read [un]locks from blkg_conf_prep/finish() Tejun Heo
2023-01-08 17:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-09 20:48     ` Tejun Heo
2023-01-10  6:49       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-10 18:24         ` Tejun Heo
2023-01-10 22:27 [PATCHSET v3 block/for-next] blkcg: Improve blkg config helpers and make iolatency init lazy Tejun Heo
2023-01-10 22:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] blkcg: Drop unnecessary RCU read [un]locks from blkg_conf_prep/finish() Tejun Heo
2023-04-13  0:06 [PATCHSET v4 block/for-next] blkcg: Improve blkg config helpers and make iolatency init lazy Tejun Heo
2023-04-13  0:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] blkcg: Drop unnecessary RCU read [un]locks from blkg_conf_prep/finish() Tejun Heo
2023-04-13  4:59   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230105002007.157497-2-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.