From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] tools/nolibc: Fix S_ISxxx macros
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 10:18:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230106171834.41532-1-imp@bsdimp.com> (raw)
The mode field has the type encoded as an value in a field, not as a bit
mask. Mask the mode with S_IFMT instead of each type to test. Otherwise,
false positives are possible: eg S_ISDIR will return true for block
devices because S_IFDIR = 0040000 and S_IFBLK = 0060000 since mode is
masked with S_IFDIR instead of S_IFMT. These macros now match the
similar definitions in tools/include/uapi/linux/stat.h.
Signed-off-by: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
---
tools/include/nolibc/types.h | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/types.h b/tools/include/nolibc/types.h
index 959997034e55..7770328dcef7 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/types.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/types.h
@@ -26,13 +26,13 @@
#define S_IFSOCK 0140000
#define S_IFMT 0170000
-#define S_ISDIR(mode) (((mode) & S_IFDIR) == S_IFDIR)
-#define S_ISCHR(mode) (((mode) & S_IFCHR) == S_IFCHR)
-#define S_ISBLK(mode) (((mode) & S_IFBLK) == S_IFBLK)
-#define S_ISREG(mode) (((mode) & S_IFREG) == S_IFREG)
-#define S_ISFIFO(mode) (((mode) & S_IFIFO) == S_IFIFO)
-#define S_ISLNK(mode) (((mode) & S_IFLNK) == S_IFLNK)
-#define S_ISSOCK(mode) (((mode) & S_IFSOCK) == S_IFSOCK)
+#define S_ISDIR(mode) (((mode) & S_IFMT) == S_IFDIR)
+#define S_ISCHR(mode) (((mode) & S_IFMT) == S_IFCHR)
+#define S_ISBLK(mode) (((mode) & S_IFMT) == S_IFBLK)
+#define S_ISREG(mode) (((mode) & S_IFMT) == S_IFREG)
+#define S_ISFIFO(mode) (((mode) & S_IFMT) == S_IFIFO)
+#define S_ISLNK(mode) (((mode) & S_IFMT) == S_IFLNK)
+#define S_ISSOCK(mode) (((mode) & S_IFMT) == S_IFSOCK)
/* dirent types */
#define DT_UNKNOWN 0x0
--
2.33.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-01-06 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-06 17:18 Warner Losh [this message]
2023-01-08 9:34 ` [PATCH v2] tools/nolibc: Fix S_ISxxx macros Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230106171834.41532-1-imp@bsdimp.com \
--to=imp@bsdimp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.