From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB8DFC54EBE for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 06:56:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1673333795; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=Y2W0ltHGsgP/knK09T8a2YJGYHNvZF53zY6VCcvndaE=; b=UCzZHxKbm6PT50L8vOcNr27vGPgAmSrSnqYhuzEMsR6ML6RQbhvuHoY5X04GBBdmpRLH2R qOnaRpeVEnbXa+mcpCZshsL4pHIjGOPjcDb3YB+Ly2CBpjvuF7v6VnOcPyI6giCqUb4Bwn xO8db055lKC/6QKUhqMlc62crdbKubo= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-452-TJVnhsYZMEGLU0HAB2Dyaw-1; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 01:56:32 -0500 X-MC-Unique: TJVnhsYZMEGLU0HAB2Dyaw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AD0D2999B37; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 06:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (unknown [10.30.29.100]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC6F492C18; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 06:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305001949751; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 06:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) by mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11A01946587 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 06:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id C0D29492C18; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 06:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast08.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.24]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B981C492C14 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 06:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A203C3806624 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 06:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-46-Vc-GsJYIOmqT3OqyZElPpg-1; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 01:56:26 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Vc-GsJYIOmqT3OqyZElPpg-1 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 2E03868C4E; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 07:56:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 07:56:23 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Pankaj Raghav Message-ID: <20230110065623.GD10289@lst.de> References: <20230106083317.93938-1-p.raghav@samsung.com> <20230106083317.93938-6-p.raghav@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20230106083317.93938-6-p.raghav@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 5/7] dm-zoned: ensure only power of 2 zone sizes are allowed X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, bvanassche@acm.org, gost.dev@samsung.com, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, snitzer@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pankajraghav.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, Johannes Thumshirn , hch@lst.de, Luis Chamberlain Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Sender: "dm-devel" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Given that we don't even support the non pow of 2 zones in the block layer I don't see why this is needed. But either way it doesn't really seem to fit into this series. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B59C46467 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 06:57:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229538AbjAJG4q (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2023 01:56:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33502 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235755AbjAJG41 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2023 01:56:27 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D47BE3726D; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 22:56:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 2E03868C4E; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 07:56:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 07:56:23 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Pankaj Raghav Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, kernel@pankajraghav.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de, bvanassche@acm.org, snitzer@kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, hch@lst.de, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com, Luis Chamberlain , Johannes Thumshirn Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] dm-zoned: ensure only power of 2 zone sizes are allowed Message-ID: <20230110065623.GD10289@lst.de> References: <20230106083317.93938-1-p.raghav@samsung.com> <20230106083317.93938-6-p.raghav@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230106083317.93938-6-p.raghav@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Given that we don't even support the non pow of 2 zones in the block layer I don't see why this is needed. But either way it doesn't really seem to fit into this series.