From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9324DC3DA78 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:49:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F60260ECD; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:49:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 3F60260ECD X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kUZWHWjP1GQD; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2E060BD4; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:49:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 8A2E060BD4 Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22431BF2A5 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB7A415A9 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:49:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 8CB7A415A9 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hVYCTSHu8wYe for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:49:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 75806410CB Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (smtp5-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.5]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75806410CB for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ymorin.is-a-geek.org (unknown [171.22.1.1]) (Authenticated sender: yann.morin.1998@free.fr) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CE8E5FFA5; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 21:49:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by ymorin.is-a-geek.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 14 Jan 2023 21:49:23 +0100 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 21:49:23 +0100 From: "Yann E. MORIN" To: Nicolas Carrier Message-ID: <20230114204923.GD199036@scaer> References: <20230114203859.GC199036@scaer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230114203859.GC199036@scaer> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1673729366; bh=Zi4I/mhlqdvHAkJiHwrxW+ianCgxYAOdKK+nnuXKtVk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BymiKF6xvgNiHZTJG4ksMToryUlr3JgVQ5ohLSNI+sNQG0SWOqAhQe5pxRJEOcUGJ 9g41HZ1m6W85r9T/taYYgJteYXIPdQsB55xRegyPbbHKLYyU9LO5VHqmw+EXSHBM21 EwAwYaOuSFMudc3BT0PXpYm3yAXwPQxGIFxupChzfNnI6pwYV6BwW1hxobPB48H8Bq fz8KZYpuCL7FMiV5ix3GLxZiUgXXPy/UnTuPvBLD55RZz2ZnoaHW599rf18Ngr2lIY iRTgv8Yjj/RIQUO25XeShKDs0UtncidpxOkquZF5qtpFVwYEdGUjjJvVYutTcXPTKK VAl2yI4dM754Q== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=free.fr header.i=@free.fr header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=smtp-20201208 header.b=BymiKF6x Subject: Re: [Buildroot] package/pkg-generic.mk: no legal info WARNING if REDISTRIBUTE = NO X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com" , "buildroot@buildroot.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Nicolas, All, On 2023-01-14 21:38 +0100, Yann E. MORIN spake thusly: > On 2023-01-13 13:20 +0000, Nicolas Carrier spake thusly: [--SNIP--] > > But in the situation where the packages has explicitly defined > > FOO_REDISTRIBUTE = NO > > in its .mk file, it makes no sense since the sources wouldn't be saved > > anyway. > Yes, it makes sense. I now realise that my comment was ambiguoug, given what I was commenting on. So, let me rephrase: Indeed, emitting the warning does not make sense. Indeed, what you explained does make sense. There, ambiguity resolved. ;-) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot