From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Adham Faris <afaris@nvidia.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Subject: [net 03/10] net/mlx5e: Remove redundant xsk pointer check in mlx5e_mpwrq_validate_xsk
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 00:04:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230118080414.77902-4-saeed@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230118080414.77902-1-saeed@kernel.org>
From: Adham Faris <afaris@nvidia.com>
This validation function is relevant only for XSK cases, hence it
assumes to be called only with xsk != NULL.
Thus checking for invalid xsk pointer is redundant and misleads static
code analyzers.
This commit removes redundant xsk pointer check.
This solves the following smatch warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/params.c:481
mlx5e_mpwrq_validate_xsk() error: we previously assumed 'xsk' could be
null (see line 478)
Fixes: 6470d2e7e8ed ("net/mlx5e: xsk: Use KSM for unaligned XSK")
Signed-off-by: Adham Faris <afaris@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/params.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/params.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/params.c
index 585bdc8383ee..4ad19c981294 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/params.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/params.c
@@ -578,7 +578,6 @@ int mlx5e_mpwrq_validate_xsk(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, struct mlx5e_params *pa
{
enum mlx5e_mpwrq_umr_mode umr_mode = mlx5e_mpwrq_umr_mode(mdev, xsk);
u8 page_shift = mlx5e_mpwrq_page_shift(mdev, xsk);
- bool unaligned = xsk ? xsk->unaligned : false;
u16 max_mtu_pkts;
if (!mlx5e_check_fragmented_striding_rq_cap(mdev, page_shift, umr_mode))
@@ -591,7 +590,7 @@ int mlx5e_mpwrq_validate_xsk(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, struct mlx5e_params *pa
* needed number of WQEs exceeds the maximum.
*/
max_mtu_pkts = min_t(u8, MLX5E_PARAMS_MAXIMUM_LOG_RQ_SIZE,
- mlx5e_mpwrq_max_log_rq_pkts(mdev, page_shift, unaligned));
+ mlx5e_mpwrq_max_log_rq_pkts(mdev, page_shift, xsk->unaligned));
if (params->log_rq_mtu_frames > max_mtu_pkts) {
mlx5_core_err(mdev, "Current RQ length %d is too big for XSK with given frame size %u\n",
1 << params->log_rq_mtu_frames, xsk->chunk_size);
--
2.39.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-18 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-18 8:04 [pull request][net 00/10] mlx5 fixes 2023-01-18 Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-18 8:04 ` [net 01/10] net/mlx5: fix missing mutex_unlock in mlx5_fw_fatal_reporter_err_work() Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-19 14:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-01-18 8:04 ` [net 02/10] net/mlx5e: Avoid false lock dependency warning on tc_ht even more Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-18 8:04 ` Saeed Mahameed [this message]
2023-01-18 8:04 ` [net 04/10] net/mlx5: E-switch, Fix setting of reserved fields on MODIFY_SCHEDULING_ELEMENT Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-18 8:04 ` [net 05/10] net/mlx5e: QoS, Fix wrongfully setting parent_element_id " Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-18 8:04 ` [net 06/10] net/mlx5e: Set decap action based on attr for sample Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-18 8:04 ` [net 07/10] net/mlx5e: Remove optimization which prevented update of ESN state Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-18 8:04 ` [net 08/10] net/mlx5e: Protect global IPsec ASO Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-18 8:04 ` [net 09/10] net/mlx5: E-switch, Fix switchdev mode after devlink reload Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-18 8:04 ` [net 10/10] net: mlx5: eliminate anonymous module_init & module_exit Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-19 4:55 ` [pull request][net 00/10] mlx5 fixes 2023-01-18 Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230118080414.77902-4-saeed@kernel.org \
--to=saeed@kernel.org \
--cc=afaris@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.