diff for duplicates of <20230119082903.yk3uslfrjtxzassi@orel>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index e48c16a..5ff960b 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 09:54:46PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
 > On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 08:32:37PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
 > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:18:59PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
 > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:21:36AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
-> > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:29:57AM +0100, Heiko St?bner wrote:
+> > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:29:57AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
 > > > > > Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2023, 18:10:19 CET schrieb Jisheng Zhang:
 > > > > > > riscv_cpufeature_patch_func() currently only scans a limited set of
 > > > > > > cpufeatures, explicitly defined with macros. Extend it to probe for all
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 09:54:46PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
 > > > > yesterday here [*]. It seems we need the concept of cpufeatures, which
 > > > > may be extensions or non-extensions.
 > > > > 
-> > > > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y77xyNPNqnFQUqAx at xhacker/
+> > > > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y77xyNPNqnFQUqAx@xhacker/
 > > > > 
 > > > > > See Palmer's series [0].
 > > > > > 
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 09:54:46PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
 > > > that? I dunno, maybe that is whatever the corollary of "premature
 > > > optimisation" is for this discussion.
 > > > 
-> > > That's my unsolicited ? 0.02, hopefully I wasn't off-base with the
+> > > That's my unsolicited € 0.02, hopefully I wasn't off-base with the
 > > > assumptions I made.
 > > 
 > > The order in which an alternative is added to the macro does matter,
@@ -182,4 +182,11 @@ drew
 > Thanks,
 > Conor.
 > 
-> 1 - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/mhng-775d4068-6c1e-48a4-a1dc-b4a76ff26bb3 at palmer-ri-x1c9a/
+> 1 - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/mhng-775d4068-6c1e-48a4-a1dc-b4a76ff26bb3@palmer-ri-x1c9a/
+
+
+
+_______________________________________________
+linux-riscv mailing list
+linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index f17b3ae..f2df533 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -6,9 +6,20 @@
  "ref\0Y8MRZQENua+wi34T@spud\0"
  "ref\0Y8hqptFcUgjhns4F@spud\0"
  "From\0Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH v3 05/13] riscv: cpufeature: extend riscv_cpufeature_patch_func to all ISA extensions\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v3 05/13] riscv: cpufeature: extend riscv_cpufeature_patch_func to all ISA extensions\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 19 Jan 2023 09:29:03 +0100\0"
- "To\0kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>\0"
+ "Cc\0Heiko St\303\274bner <heiko@sntech.de>"
+  Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
+  Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
+  Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
+  Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
+  Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>
+  Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
+  linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  kvm@vger.kernel.org
+ " kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 09:54:46PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:\n"
@@ -19,7 +30,7 @@
  "> On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 08:32:37PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:\n"
  "> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:18:59PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:\n"
  "> > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:21:36AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:\n"
- "> > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:29:57AM +0100, Heiko St?bner wrote:\n"
+ "> > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:29:57AM +0100, Heiko St\303\274bner wrote:\n"
  "> > > > > Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2023, 18:10:19 CET schrieb Jisheng Zhang:\n"
  "> > > > > > riscv_cpufeature_patch_func() currently only scans a limited set of\n"
  "> > > > > > cpufeatures, explicitly defined with macros. Extend it to probe for all\n"
@@ -45,7 +56,7 @@
  "> > > > yesterday here [*]. It seems we need the concept of cpufeatures, which\n"
  "> > > > may be extensions or non-extensions.\n"
  "> > > > \n"
- "> > > > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y77xyNPNqnFQUqAx at xhacker/\n"
+ "> > > > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y77xyNPNqnFQUqAx@xhacker/\n"
  "> > > > \n"
  "> > > > > See Palmer's series [0].\n"
  "> > > > > \n"
@@ -122,7 +133,7 @@
  "> > > that? I dunno, maybe that is whatever the corollary of \"premature\n"
  "> > > optimisation\" is for this discussion.\n"
  "> > > \n"
- "> > > That's my unsolicited ? 0.02, hopefully I wasn't off-base with the\n"
+ "> > > That's my unsolicited \342\202\254 0.02, hopefully I wasn't off-base with the\n"
  "> > > assumptions I made.\n"
  "> > \n"
  "> > The order in which an alternative is added to the macro does matter,\n"
@@ -195,6 +206,13 @@
  "> Thanks,\n"
  "> Conor.\n"
  "> \n"
- > 1 - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/mhng-775d4068-6c1e-48a4-a1dc-b4a76ff26bb3 at palmer-ri-x1c9a/
+ "> 1 - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/mhng-775d4068-6c1e-48a4-a1dc-b4a76ff26bb3@palmer-ri-x1c9a/\n"
+ "\n"
+ "\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "linux-riscv mailing list\n"
+ "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
 
-3258724408b86916362075b2f7a5bc50784ba7950df025b9cf1a5a2ccb554530
+72a7ce105fa2daabf275481ef8ffeac67176d0f1dfc2f44a9096a2472939dbd6
